Linux kbuild/kconfig development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, "Bill Wendling" <morbo@google.com>,
	"Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: Remove SANCOV plugin
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 21:28:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f7e3436-8ae8-473d-be64-c962366ca5c8@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202504090919.6DE21CFA7A@keescook>

On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 18:19, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 06:16:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 18:02, Kees Cook wrote:
>> 
>> >  config KCOV
>> >  	bool "Code coverage for fuzzing"
>> >  	depends on ARCH_HAS_KCOV
>> > -	depends on CC_HAS_SANCOV_TRACE_PC || GCC_PLUGINS
>> > +	depends on CC_HAS_SANCOV_TRACE_PC
>> 
>> So this dependency would also disappear. I think either way is fine.
>> 
>> The rest of the patch is again identical to my version.
>
> Ah! How about you keep the patch as part of your gcc-8.1 clean up, then?
> That seems more clear, etc.

Sure, I can probably keep that all in a branch of the asm-generic
tree, or alternatively send it through the kbuild tree.

Shall I include the patch to remove the structleak plugin as well?

       Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 16:02 [PATCH] gcc-plugins: Remove SANCOV plugin Kees Cook
2025-04-09 16:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-09 16:19   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 19:28     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2025-04-09 20:21       ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 20:22       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f7e3436-8ae8-473d-be64-c962366ca5c8@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox