From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lemon.ertos.nicta.com.au ([203.143.174.143]:33029 "EHLO lemon.ken.nicta.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750892AbZGXBiu (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:38:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:39:55 +1000 Message-ID: <87ws5yoo44.wl%peterc@nicta.com.au> From: Peter Chubb In-Reply-To: <20090723212809.GB9488@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <200907232056.51064.elendil@planet.nl> <20090723212809.GB9488@merkur.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: minor Makefile simplification through use of cc-ifversion Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Frans Pop , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Sam" == Sam Ravnborg writes: Sam> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: Sam> The above change is correct. But I really wonder if the original Sam> code was correct? Do we really only want to use the -mtune Sam> options for this specific gcc version? If this is indeed the Sam> case this deserves a comment explaning this. I suspect it should be all compilers after this one. -mtune=mckinley didn't work very well in the early gcc 3 compilers and didn't exist in version 2. -- Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia