From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:16218 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725802AbgAVSAz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:00:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dtc: Add dtb build information option References: <20200113181625.3130-1-alexandre.torgue@st.com> <20200113181625.3130-2-alexandre.torgue@st.com> <20200116005741.GB54439@umbus> <20200117090937.GU54439@umbus> <20200120181708.GN3697@linaro.org> From: Alexandre Torgue Message-ID: <9d83a36c-78c5-3452-bb48-209d68c46038@st.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:00:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200120181708.GN3697@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Steve McIntyre , Rob Herring , David Gibson , Frank Rowand , ian@freebsd.org Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Simon Glass , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Devicetree Compiler Hi On 1/20/20 7:17 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:43:23AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 6:26 AM David Gibson >> wrote: > > ... > >>> What might be better would be to have a dtc option which force appends >>> an extra .dts to the mail .dts compiled. You can then put an overlay >>> template in that file, something like: >>> >>> &{/} { >>> linux,build-info = /incbin/ "build-info.txt; >>> } >> >> I like this suggestion either as an include another dts file or an >> overlay. The latter could be useful as a way to maintain current dtb >> files while splitting the source files into base and overlay dts >> files. > > ACK, that sounds like it could be helpful. > >> But no, let's not prepend this with 'linux'. It's not a property >> specific for Linux to consume. > > Right. We might be seeing the data coming through from U-Boot (or any > other random bootloader) too. > > Cheers, > Thanks for reviews. I gonna prepare a V2 with David proposition (to use overlay format) by keeping in mind not to modify existing dts(i) files. Remaining questions are: 1- "build-info" or "linux,build-info"? IMO, If information is "generic" then first one should be used. 2- Looking at Franck proposition[1] some years ago and objections on it, do you think that this one could accepted ? regards Alex [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/550A42AC.8060104@gmail.com/