Re: [PATCH 0/4] [v4] Kbuild: std=gnu11 changes

[Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 06:18:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:09 AM Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > >
> > > > I've incorporated the feedback from Masahiro Yamada in this
> > > > version, splitting out one more patch, rebasing on top of
> > > > the kbuild tree, and changing the order of the patches.
> > > >
> > > > Please apply to the kbuild tree.
> > >
> > > I'd actually like to see this as a separate branch, so that I can
> > > merge it early - or other peoples git branches end up depending on it.
> >
> >
> > OK, I can apply this to a separate branch, kbuild-gnu11.
> > (and I will queue this up shortly because it is already -rc7)
> >
> > Then, I will send two pull reqs in the next MW,
> > but please note they will conflict with each other,
> > between this gnu11 patch set and the following
> > one in my usual kbuild branch:
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/patch/20220201213542.2808035-1-quic_eberman@quicinc.com/
> >
> >
> > I hope this is not a complex conflict, but please let me know
> > if you have any requests to me.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> All, applied to linux-kbuild/kbuild-gnu11.
> 
> If somebody wants to give Reviewed-by, Acked-by, Tested-by, please.
> 
> I will append them later.

For the series:

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

Cheers,
Nathan