From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/config: Make the x86 defconfigs a bit more usable
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:50:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxHD1MkulyL3yB9y@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkHXQTKImf7Wr+Sk@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
* Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:03:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yeah, good catch! ...
> >
> > I use defconfigs by explicitly adding in the architecture:
> >
> > kepler:~/tip> make ARCH=i386 defconfig
> >
> > kepler:~/tip> kconfig-arch
> > i386
> >
> > ... so never I noticed this bug.
>
> Ah, good point!
>
> > I fixed this in the latest version (attached).
> >
> > Arguably 'make ARCH=i386 savedefconfig' should preserve this, so that
> > refreshing defconfigs on bi-arch architectures is idempotent, but that's no
> > excuse to regress the existing defconfig behavior.
>
> Hmmm, I thought that it would, but I think the behavior of savedefconfig
> is actually correct with regards to how it handles CONFIG_64BIT in the
> presence of an explicit ARCH value, based on how CONFIG_64BIT is
> defined:
>
> config 64BIT
> bool "64-bit kernel" if "$(ARCH)" = "x86"
> default "$(ARCH)" != "i386"
> help
> Say yes to build a 64-bit kernel - formerly known as x86_64
> Say no to build a 32-bit kernel - formerly known as i386
>
> As the default is no when ARCH == i386 and there is no prompt in that
> situation, "# CONFIG_64BIT is not set" gets dropped, as that is the
> default. Using savedefconfig without the ARCH variable would do the
> right thing.
>
> I tried playing around with these Kconfig symbols to see if I could get
> something that would work for savedefconfig with or without ARCH, but I
> could not really come up with anything. I did not try super hard though,
> it might still be possible.
Unfortunately, even without the ARCH=i386 'make savedefconfig' doesn't seem
to be doing the right thing & is dropping the '# CONFIG_64BIT is not set'
line:
kepler:~/tip> make ARCH=i386 defconfig
*** Default configuration is based on 'i386_defconfig'
#
# configuration written to .config
#
kepler:~/tip> make savedefconfig
kepler:~/tip> diff -up arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig defconfig
--- arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig 2022-09-02 10:45:43.117430882 +0200
+++ defconfig 2022-09-02 10:46:56.663864901 +0200
@@ -282,4 +282,3 @@ CONFIG_PROVIDE_OHCI1394_DMA_INIT=y
CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_DBGP=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_BOOT_PARAMS=y
CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER=y
-# CONFIG_64BIT is not set
kepler:~/tip>
This is annoying in that every time I modify the i386 defconfig and use
'make savedefconfig', I have to manually revert that change ...
This reduces the usability of 'make savedefconfig' quite a bit.
Maybe Masahiro-san can tell me how I'm doing this wrong?
Thanks,
Ingo
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-02 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <YjhdcJB4FaLfsoyO@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wjS6ptr5=JqmmyEb_qTjDz_68+S=h1o1bL1fEyArVOymA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <YjpLiKRUIB4TGJm0@zn.tnic>
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wifoM9VOp-55OZCRcO9MnqQ109UTuCiXeZ-eyX_JcNVGg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <YjsCpoRK7W4l6tSh@zn.tnic>
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wi9pLxm+dXoCaiGO+f0EbhyfAR_L510vD0c2=hj6rbMXg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <YjwsUT/6PkRPjnHE@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <YjySjys3QZAWFlfo@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
[not found] ` <YkC08gKqJOUM7CA8@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <YkHXQTKImf7Wr+Sk@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
2022-09-02 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2022-09-02 9:18 ` [PATCH] x86/config: Make the x86 defconfigs a bit more usable Masahiro Yamada
2022-09-04 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-09-05 2:16 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-09-05 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <CAK7LNAQyiNpbLuVjjQ8-GOQECtfQZqsNS8xH0E2ZkLAHYtXt7A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-09-10 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxHD1MkulyL3yB9y@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox