From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C9A1DFD8; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706288430; cv=none; b=RNkvQLgoaSzihldOxrFGHQj7slAKY47v98V6Zu8622y+AcGEXl72Q0lPTo7WhgYpB6fps2qtA+x+v6YViFrDHmK0GhdJXhwrkN0LboCZoUKSah//XwjKJpdnXFq/yDdGUuFRssQqpMH9jS2mVW5ekiLBbgrx09RagOgt0ZLIGjY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706288430; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IKSWKIZsjMZWZWERh7avT8L31KXo0Zec9oXMsAJHcmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LyGjSN8eU7AGaDDrUg8Mf7Ugka0pdhRHuLGa/ZUuZ4SqcWp5Dw87z74VHKoe52McBeapjTYhE+kIBAuzpuw5TFRQzxahNvoqj+JUTH7hOXkNsreM8nWU/+1AK/8QB8eoEosaUAKEFhS73kgdow8q3lhe141V2ENsgeQ7mbsGDHg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DBF1FB; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.47.163]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14E733F762; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:00:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:00:15 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, nicolas@fjasle.eu, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] arm64: Kconfig: Clean up tautological LLVM version checks Message-ID: References: <20240125-bump-min-llvm-ver-to-13-0-1-v1-0-f5ff9bda41c5@kernel.org> <20240125-bump-min-llvm-ver-to-13-0-1-v1-5-f5ff9bda41c5@kernel.org> <20240126161025.GA3265550@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240126161025.GA3265550@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:10:25AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:59:55PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:55:11PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN > > > bool "Build big-endian kernel" > > > - depends on !LD_IS_LLD || LLD_VERSION >= 130000 > > > # https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1379b150991f70a5782e9a143c2ba5308da1161c > > > > We can delete the URL here, since that was just to describe why this depended > > upon LLVM 13+; it's weird for it to sit here on its own. > > I think this is the URL for the fix for the problem brought up by > commit 146a15b87335 ("arm64: Restrict CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to GNU as or LLVM > IAS 15.x or newer"), so I think it should stay? It does not look like I > ever added a link or context for the LLD line, I definitely should have. Whoops; I clearly misread that, and yes it should stay. Sorry about that; for the patch as-is: Acked-by: Mark Rutland Mark.