From: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Morten Linderud <morten@linderud.pw>,
Haelwenn Monnier <contact@lanodan.eu>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/11] kbuild: document some prerequisites
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 22:07:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyaUoGqu6bXDX26s@fjasle.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240819160309.2218114-3-vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 06:02:59PM +0200 Vegard Nossum wrote:
> When running 'make --dry-run', make will invoke itself recursively for
> recipes using $(MAKE), but otherwise not execute the other commands in
> a recipe.
>
> However, if a prerequisite is missing and 'make' does not how to create it
> (which will be the case when running 'make -n'), it will complain with an
> error message like this:
>
> $ make -n
> ...
> make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modpost
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'modules.order', needed by 'modules-only.symvers'. Stop.
> make: *** [Makefile:1868: modpost] Error 2
>
> In this case, the top-level makefile has reached a recipe that ran 'make'
> recursively on scripts/Makefile.modpost, which itself has a rule with
> modules.order as a prerequisite. Since the file doesn't exist, and make
> doesn't know how to create it, it errors out.
>
> We can document such prerequisites (which are expected to be created by
> the parent Makefile) by adding them to the PHONY list of each respective
> Makefile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile | 6 ++++++
> scripts/Makefile.modfinal | 5 +++++
> scripts/Makefile.modpost | 4 ++++
> scripts/Makefile.vmlinux | 7 +++++++
> scripts/Makefile.vmlinux_o | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> index f2051644de943..ccef6f0e04bc7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ quiet_cmd_voffset = VOFFSET $@
>
> targets += ../voffset.h
>
> +# We don't know how to build this
A comment for documentation is a good idea, but I think this one is not very
helpful to those who don't know the patch description. What about something
like this?
# Provided by a recursive-make predecessor
Kind regards
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-02 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-19 16:02 [RFC PATCH 00/11] output a valid shell script when running 'make -n' Vegard Nossum
2024-08-19 16:02 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] kbuild: ignore .config rule for make --always-make Vegard Nossum
2024-11-02 21:07 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-11-02 21:39 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-03 11:15 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:02 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] kbuild: document some prerequisites Vegard Nossum
2024-11-02 21:07 ` Nicolas Schier [this message]
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] kbuild: pass KERNELVERSION and LOCALVERSION explicitly to setlocalversion Vegard Nossum
2024-11-02 21:07 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] kbuild: don't execute .ko recipe in --dry-run mode Vegard Nossum
2024-11-02 21:08 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] kbuild: execute modules.order " Vegard Nossum
2024-11-02 21:10 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] kbuild: set $dry_run when running " Vegard Nossum
2024-11-02 21:11 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] kbuild: define 'make' as a no-op " Vegard Nossum
2024-11-14 10:47 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] kbuild: make link-vmlinux.sh respect $dry_run Vegard Nossum
2024-11-14 10:47 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] kbuild: simplify commands in --dry-run mode Vegard Nossum
2024-11-14 10:48 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] kbuild: don't test for file presence " Vegard Nossum
2024-11-14 10:48 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-19 16:03 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] kbuild: suppress echoing of commands " Vegard Nossum
2024-11-14 10:49 ` Nicolas Schier
2024-09-25 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] output a valid shell script when running 'make -n' Vegard Nossum
2024-11-02 21:07 ` Nicolas Schier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyaUoGqu6bXDX26s@fjasle.eu \
--to=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=contact@lanodan.eu \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=morten@linderud.pw \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox