linux-kbuild.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: dima@arista.com
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>, Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gen_init_cpio: Do fsync() only on regular files
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 21:40:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOSZo8h6l2XNin3C@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251007-gen_init_cpio-pipe-v1-1-d782674d4926@arista.com>

On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 12:55:03AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
> 
> Here at Arista gen_init_cpio is used in testing in order to create
> an initramfs for specific tests. Most notably, there is a test that does
> essentially a fork-bomb in kdump/panic kernel, replacing build-time
> generated init script: instead of doing makedumpfile, it does call
> shell tests.

Why is is using fsync at all?  Seems like this was added in

commit ae18b94099b04264b32e33b057114024bc72c993
Author: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Date:   Tue Aug 19 13:05:45 2025 +1000

    gen_init_cpio: support -o <output_file> parameter

without any good explanation.  In general doing a per-file fsync
is going to horrible wreck performance, and given that no one is
interested in partial initramfs archives also rather pointless.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-07  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 23:55 [PATCH RFC] gen_init_cpio: Do fsync() only on regular files Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay
2025-10-07  0:07 ` Dmitry Safonov
2025-10-07  1:17 ` David Disseldorp
2025-10-07  3:09   ` Dmitry Safonov
2025-10-07  4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-10-07  5:57   ` David Disseldorp
2025-10-07  6:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-07  6:25       ` David Disseldorp
2025-10-07  6:28         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOSZo8h6l2XNin3C@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ddiss@suse.de \
    --cc=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).