public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tools/testing/selftests
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:52:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acso4-02tZhFBnKI@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330170954.47dfef29063afe9ea502505a@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 05:09:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2026 18:04:52 +0800 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > > ts:/usr/src/25> cat Makefile
> > > # Automatically generated by /usr/src/25/Makefile: don't edit
> > > export KBUILD_OUTPUT = .
> > > export KBUILD_EXTMOD = /usr/src/25
> > > export KBUILD_EXTMOD_OUTPUT = /usr/src/25
> > > include /usr/src/25/Makefile
> > > 
> > > I've done this twice in succession now.  Any suggestions where I should
> > > look?
> > 
> > When build selftests from the top-level, sub-makes entered via `-C` may
> > still inherit the caller's PWD from the environment.
> > 
> > Some selftests use $(PWD) in recursive kbuild invocations, which can
> > then incorrectly resolve to the kernel top directory instead of the
> > current test directory.
> > 
> > Maybe try export PWD in the ../selftests/lib.mk?
> > 
> >   export PWD := $(CURDIR)
> 
> Thanks, I'll get onto this stuff soon.
 
I have created a patchset for those build tiny issues,
let me send out to you to have a early try?

> Meanwhile, shouldn't this work?
> 
> ts:/usr/src/25/tools/testing/selftests/mm> make merge.i
> make: *** No rule to make target 'merge.i'.  Stop.

That's probably because Makefile explicitly disables the implicit .c to .i rule.

In line#43 of Makefile:

    MAKEFLAGS += --no-builtin-rules

I doubt do we really need to add back the 'gcc -E' approach? 
The selftests build system intentionally kills built-in rules to prevent
half-broken implicit builds.
(the comment line# 33~42 in the Makefile explains why)

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-27 21:32 tools/testing/selftests Andrew Morton
2026-03-28  2:12 ` tools/testing/selftests Li Wang
2026-03-28  4:09   ` tools/testing/selftests Andrew Morton
2026-03-29  9:29     ` tools/testing/selftests Li Wang
     [not found]   ` <20260328135650.435b415f8c00835b2fa471e0@linux-foundation.org>
2026-03-28 21:03     ` tools/testing/selftests Andrew Morton
2026-03-29 10:04       ` tools/testing/selftests Li Wang
2026-03-31  0:09         ` tools/testing/selftests Andrew Morton
2026-03-31  1:52           ` Li Wang [this message]
2026-03-31  3:49             ` tools/testing/selftests Andrew Morton
2026-03-31  5:09               ` tools/testing/selftests Li Wang
2026-04-01  0:00 ` tools/testing/selftests Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acso4-02tZhFBnKI@redhat.com \
    --to=liwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox