From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nicolas Schier" <nsc@kernel.org>,
"Mikhail Zaslonko" <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
"Vasileios Almpanis" <vasileios.almpanis@virtuozzo.com>,
"Pavel Tikhomirov" <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] gcov: use atomic counter updates to fix concurrent access crashes
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 11:15:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1b6e768-51af-468b-a729-0ed3fceef2f1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511105052.417187-2-khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
On 11.05.2026 12:50, Konstantin Khorenko wrote:
> GCC's GCOV instrumentation can merge global branch counters with loop
> induction variables as an optimization. In inflate_fast(), the inner
> copy loops get transformed so that the GCOV counter value is loaded
> multiple times to compute the loop base address, start index, and end
> bound. Since GCOV counters are global (not per-CPU), concurrent
> execution on different CPUs causes the counter to change between loads,
> producing inconsistent values and out-of-bounds memory writes.
>
> The crash manifests during IPComp (IP Payload Compression) processing
> when inflate_fast() runs concurrently on multiple CPUs:
>
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffd0a3c0902ffa
> RIP: inflate_fast+1431
> Call Trace:
> zlib_inflate
> __deflate_decompress
> crypto_comp_decompress
> ipcomp_decompress [xfrm_ipcomp]
> ipcomp_input [xfrm_ipcomp]
> xfrm_input
>
> At the crash point, the compiler generated three loads from the same
> global GCOV counter (__gcov0.inflate_fast+216) to compute base, start,
> and end for an indexed loop. Another CPU modified the counter between
> loads, making the values inconsistent - the write went 3.4 MB past a
> 65 KB buffer.
>
> Add -fprofile-update=prefer-atomic to CFLAGS_GCOV at the global level in
> the top-level Makefile, guarded by a try-run compile test. The test
> compiles a minimal program with and without -fprofile-update=prefer-atomic
> using the full KBUILD_CFLAGS, then compares undefined symbols in the
> resulting object files. If prefer-atomic introduces new undefined
> references (such as __atomic_fetch_add_8 on i386 or
> __aarch64_ldadd8_relax on arm64 with outline-atomics), the flag is not
> added -- the kernel does not link against libatomic.
>
> On architectures where GCC inlines 64-bit atomic counter updates
> (x86_64, s390, ...) the test passes and the flag is enabled, preventing
> the compiler from merging counters with loop induction variables and
> fixing the observed concurrent-access crash.
>
> On architectures where the flag would introduce libatomic dependencies,
> it is silently omitted and behaviour is no worse than before this patch.
>
> Move the CFLAGS_GCOV block from its original position (before the arch
> Makefile include) to after the core KBUILD_CFLAGS assignments but before
> the scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins include.
> This placement ensures the try-run test sees arch-specific flags
> (-m32, -march=, -mno-outline-atomics) while avoiding GCC plugin flags
> (-fplugin=) that would break the test on clean builds when plugin shared
> objects do not yet exist.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
Thank you for providing this updated fix - I greatly appreciate you
working on this.
I tested this patch successfully on s390 with GCC 15.2 and GCC 16.1.
Tested-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
That said, I found some stylistic details where the patch could be
improved that I've described below for consideration/comments. But I
don't want to delay the fix any longer than necessary, therefore I'm
fine with this patch, even when not including my suggestions.
> ---
> Makefile | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 9f88dcaae382..2b352ad22d06 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -824,12 +824,6 @@ endif # KBUILD_EXTMOD
> # Defaults to vmlinux, but the arch makefile usually adds further targets
> all: vmlinux
>
> -CFLAGS_GCOV := -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
> -ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> -CFLAGS_GCOV += -fno-tree-loop-im
> -endif
> -export CFLAGS_GCOV
> -
> # The arch Makefiles can override CC_FLAGS_FTRACE. We may also append it later.
> ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := -pg
> @@ -1147,6 +1141,27 @@ endif
> # Ensure compilers do not transform certain loops into calls to wcslen()
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-builtin-wcslen
>
> +CFLAGS_GCOV := -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> +CFLAGS_GCOV += -fno-tree-loop-im
> +# Use atomic counter updates to avoid concurrent-access crashes in GCOV.
> +# Only enable if -fprofile-update=prefer-atomic does not introduce new
> +# undefined symbols (e.g. libatomic calls that the kernel cannot link).
> +CFLAGS_GCOV += $(call try-run,\
> + echo 'long long x; void f(void){x++;}' | \
> + $(CC) $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) -w -fprofile-arcs \
> + -ftest-coverage -x c - -c -o "$$TMP.base" && \
> + echo 'long long x; void f(void){x++;}' | \
> + $(CC) $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) -w -fprofile-arcs \
> + -ftest-coverage -fprofile-update=prefer-atomic \
Using $(CFLAGS_GCOV) instead of listing -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
separately would reduce duplication, automatically account for potential
future changes in the list of flags used for GCOV profiling, as well as
cover any side-effects that the third flag -fno-tree-loop-im might
have/get in the future.
> + -x c - -c -o "$$TMP" && \
> + $(NM) "$$TMP.base" | grep ' U ' > "$$TMP.ubase" || true ; \
> + $(NM) "$$TMP" | grep ' U ' > "$$TMP.utest" || true ; \
> + cmp -s "$$TMP.ubase" "$$TMP.utest",\
> + -fprofile-update=prefer-atomic)
> +endif
> +export CFLAGS_GCOV
> +
Not directly related with the functional aspects of this patch, but
since all GCOV-related Makefile portions are touched/moved this would be
a good opportunity to follow the pattern of other instrumentation
mechanisms like KCOV, KASAN, etc., that is:
- split out the CFLAGS_GCOV chunk above into a new scripts/Makefile.gcov
file
- include this file depending on the value of CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL via
include-$(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL) += scripts/Makefile.gcov
in the "additional Makefile" section that follows after this
Makefile position
--
Peter Oberparleiter
Linux on IBM Z Development - IBM Germany R&D
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 10:50 [PATCH v4 0/1] gcov: use -fprofile-update=prefer-atomic with compile-time guard Konstantin Khorenko
2026-05-11 10:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] gcov: use atomic counter updates to fix concurrent access crashes Konstantin Khorenko
2026-05-11 11:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-05-13 9:15 ` Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1b6e768-51af-468b-a729-0ed3fceef2f1@linux.ibm.com \
--to=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=vasileios.almpanis@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox