From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52038 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753682AbZBVMJ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:09:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/markers: make markers select tracepoints References: <499edf47.1818d00a.060b.2b8d@mx.google.com> <499EE162.4050008@oracle.com> <20090220172241.GF24538@elte.hu> <1235302980.4632.8.camel@laptop> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:08:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1235302980.4632.8.camel@laptop> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:43:00 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Randy Dunlap , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra writes: > I would like to never merge an ftrace_printk() user... just as I'd like > to get rid of every marker. But why? They solve a problem well enough that Ingo had in effect reinvented them on Friday. - FChE