From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] tracing/Makefile: fix handling redefinition of CC_FLAGS_FTRACE
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:07:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <your-ad-here.call-01536239243-ext-9397@work.hours> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905221059.73663a6e@vmware.local.home>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:10:59PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:35:59 -0700
> Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > As a Kernel developer, I make heavy use of "make targz-pkg" in order
> > to locally compile and remotely install my development Kernels. The
> > nice feature I rely on is that after a normal "make", "make targz-pkg"
> > only generates the tarball without having to recompile everything.
> >
> > That was true until commit f28bc3c32c05 ("tracing: Handle
> > CC_FLAGS_FTRACE more accurately"). After it, running "make targz-pkg"
> > after "make" will recompile the whole Kernel tree, making my
> > development workflow much slower.
> >
> > The Kernel is choosing to recompile everything because it claims the
> > command line has changed. A diff of the .cmd files show a repeated
> > -mfentry in one of the files. It seems that something on make
> > targz-pkg triggers the double -mfentry but not the double -pg.
>
> It's probably because the addition of -mfentry isn't protected behind a
> ifndef block (like you added in this patch).
scripts/package/Makefile:
tar%pkg: FORCE
჻·······$(MAKE) KBUILD_SRC=
჻·······$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/package/buildtar $@
scripts/package/buildtar:
if grep -q '^CONFIG_MODULES=y' "${KCONFIG_CONFIG}"; then
჻·······make ARCH="${ARCH}" O="${objtree}" KBUILD_SRC= INSTALL_MOD_PATH="${tmpdir}" modules_install
"make targz-pkg" target calls "make modules_install" and environment is
already populated with exported variables, CC_FLAGS_FTRACE being one
of them. In other words top Makefile is called recursively in
sub-make. I assume, to make it work in general exported variables should be
always recalculated to avoid side effects.
In this particular case:
ifndef CC_FLAGS_FTRACE
CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := -pg
endif
is bad, because we don't know if CC_FLAGS_FTRACE is defined in platform
specific arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile (included earlier), or coming from parent
make process as exported variable.
In my view one simple way to fix this particular case would be to move:
ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := -pg
endif
before:
include arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
where platforms set custom CC_FLAGS_FTRACE.
Or alternatively change the name of the variable that platforms have to set in
arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile (so that it does not conflict with exported variable).
> >
> > So this patch attempts to deal with that problem by handling -mfentry
> > and others just like we handle -pg: don't append them if
> > CC_FLAGS_FTRACE is already defined. I'm not a Makefile expert and so I
> > can't claim this won't break anything else, hopefully if this patch
> > gets applied it will have a Reviewed-by tag from some actual Makefile
> > expert. I can claim this patch fixes the specific regression I
> > reported.
> >
> > Fixes: commit f28bc3c32c05 ("tracing: Handle CC_FLAGS_FTRACE more
> > accurately")
> > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> > Makefile | 14 ++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 19948e556941..2c8df481b4f1 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -755,28 +755,30 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -femit-struct-debug-baseonly) \
> > endif
> >
> > ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > -ifndef CC_FLAGS_FTRACE
> > -CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := -pg
> > -endif
> > +cc_flags_ftrace_ := -pg
>
> I have no problem with this patch, but why the extra underscore at the
> end of cc_flags_ftrace_, and not just cc_flags_ftrace?
>
> -- Steve
>
> > ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> > # gcc 5 supports generating the mcount tables directly
> > ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn,-mrecord-mcount),y)
> > - CC_FLAGS_FTRACE += -mrecord-mcount
> > + cc_flags_ftrace_ += -mrecord-mcount
> > export CC_USING_RECORD_MCOUNT := 1
> > endif
> > ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_NOP_MCOUNT
> > ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn, -mnop-mcount),y)
> > - CC_FLAGS_FTRACE += -mnop-mcount
> > + cc_flags_ftrace_ += -mnop-mcount
> > CC_FLAGS_USING += -DCC_USING_NOP_MCOUNT
> > endif
> > endif
> > endif
> > ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FENTRY
> > ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn, -mfentry),y)
> > - CC_FLAGS_FTRACE += -mfentry
> > + cc_flags_ftrace_ += -mfentry
> > CC_FLAGS_USING += -DCC_USING_FENTRY
> > endif
> > endif
> > +
> > +ifndef CC_FLAGS_FTRACE
> > + CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := $(cc_flags_ftrace_)
> > +endif
Unfortunately this changes logic and inconsistent. With that change
platforms which define CC_FLAGS_FTRACE in arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
would end up without extra -mrecord-mcount, -mnop-mcount and -mfentry
build flags, while CC_FLAGS_USING would be populated and
CC_USING_RECORD_MCOUNT set.
> > export CC_FLAGS_FTRACE
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) $(CC_FLAGS_USING)
> > KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(CC_FLAGS_USING)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-05 22:35 [RFC 1/2] tracing/Makefile: fix handling redefinition of CC_FLAGS_FTRACE Paulo Zanoni
2018-09-05 22:36 ` [RFC 2/2] tracing/Makefile: reindent the CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER chunk Paulo Zanoni
2018-09-06 2:10 ` [RFC 1/2] tracing/Makefile: fix handling redefinition of CC_FLAGS_FTRACE Steven Rostedt
2018-09-06 13:07 ` Vasily Gorbik [this message]
2018-09-10 17:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Paulo Zanoni
2018-09-12 10:18 ` Vasily Gorbik
2018-09-12 18:37 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=your-ad-here.call-01536239243-ext-9397@work.hours \
--to=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox