RE: [PATCH v2] fs/hfs: fix s_fs_info leak on setup_bdev_super() failure

Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-01T19:24:11Z

On Sat, 2025-11-29 at 13:48 +0100, Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa wrote:
> On 11/27/25 9:19 PM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> >

<skipped>

> >
> > As far as I can see, the situation is improving with the patches. I can say that
> > patches have been tested and I am ready to pick up the patches into HFS/HFS+
> > tree.
> >
> > Mehdi, should I expect the formal patches from you? Or should I take the patches
> > as it is?
> >
>
> I can send them from my part. Should I add signed-off-by tag at the end
> appended to them?
>

If you are OK with the current commit message, then I can simply add your
signed-off-by tag on my side. If you would like to polish the commit message
somehow, then I can wait the patches from you. So, what is your decision?

>
> Also, I want to give an apologies for the delayed/none reply about the
> crash of xfstests on my part. I went back testing them 3 days earlier
> and they started showing different results again and then I have broken
> my finger....Which caused me to have much slower progress.I'm still
> working on getting the same crashes as I did before where I get them
> when running any test.Because I ran quick tests and they didn't crash.
> only with auto around the 631 test for desktop and around 642 on my
> laptop for both not patched and patched kernels.I'm going to update you
> on that matter when I can have predictable behavior and cause of the
> crash/call stack.But expect slow progress from my part here for the
> reason I mentionned before.
>

No problem. Take your time.

Thanks,
Slava.

>