From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1] ethernet: intel: e1000: Convert to dev_pm_ops
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 15:58:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501205803.GA129132@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410124418.34640-1-vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
[+cc Jeff, Jesse]
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 06:14:19PM +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> Convert the legacy callback .suspend() and .resume()
> to the generic ones.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 47 +++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index 2bced34c19ba..09a6ef46be96 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ static int e1000_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *netdev,
> static void e1000_restore_vlan(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -static int e1000_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state);
> -static int e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +static int e1000_suspend(struct device *dev);
> +static int e1000_resume(struct device *dev);
> #endif
> static void e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>
> @@ -179,16 +179,16 @@ static const struct pci_error_handlers e1000_err_handler = {
> .resume = e1000_io_resume,
> };
>
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(e1000_pm_ops, e1000_suspend, e1000_resume);
> +
> static struct pci_driver e1000_driver = {
> .name = e1000_driver_name,
> .id_table = e1000_pci_tbl,
> .probe = e1000_probe,
> .remove = e1000_remove,
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> - /* Power Management Hooks */
> - .suspend = e1000_suspend,
> - .resume = e1000_resume,
> -#endif
> + .driver = {
> + .pm = &e1000_pm_ops,
> + },
> .shutdown = e1000_shutdown,
> .err_handler = &e1000_err_handler
> };
> @@ -5052,9 +5052,6 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool *enable_wake)
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> u32 ctrl, ctrl_ext, rctl, status;
> u32 wufc = adapter->wol;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> - int retval = 0;
> -#endif
>
> netif_device_detach(netdev);
>
> @@ -5068,12 +5065,6 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool *enable_wake)
> e1000_down(adapter);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> - retval = pci_save_state(pdev);
> - if (retval)
> - return retval;
> -#endif
> -
> status = er32(STATUS);
> if (status & E1000_STATUS_LU)
> wufc &= ~E1000_WUFC_LNKC;
> @@ -5135,36 +5126,22 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool *enable_wake)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -static int e1000_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> +static int e1000_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> - int retval;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> bool wake;
>
> - retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake);
> - if (retval)
> - return retval;
> -
> - if (wake) {
> - pci_prepare_to_sleep(pdev);
> - } else {
> - pci_wake_from_d3(pdev, false);
I think there's a case where this changes the behavior because we
normally set the device wakeup enable to adapter->wol, but the "wake"
returned from __e1000_shutdown() is sometimes different.
e1000_probe
adapter->wol = adapter->eeprom_wol; # assume adapter->wol == 1
device_set_wakeup_enable(adapter->wol);
Existing code:
e1000_suspend
__e1000_shutdown(&wake) # assume returns wake == 0
pci_wake_from_d3(false)
pci_enable_wake(PCI_D3hot, false) # <-- compare
New code using generic PM ops:
pci_pm_suspend
e1000_suspend
__e1000_shutdown(&wake) # returns wake == 0 (ignored)
pci_pm_suspend_noirq
pci_prepare_to_sleep
wakeup = device_may_wakeup() # returns 1
pci_enable_wake(PCI_D3hot, true) # <-- different!
I sort of suspect that __e1000_shutdown() should call
device_set_wakeup_enable() when it updates the chip's wake-on-lan
registers, but the driver maintainers would know better.
> - pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> + return __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake);
> }
>
> -static int e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +static int e1000_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> u32 err;
>
> - pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
> - pci_restore_state(pdev);
> - pci_save_state(pdev);
> -
> if (adapter->need_ioport)
> err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> else
> --
> 2.26.0
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-01 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-10 12:44 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1] ethernet: intel: e1000: Convert to dev_pm_ops Vaibhav Gupta
2020-04-11 0:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-04-11 14:03 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-04-11 0:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-04-23 0:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-05-01 20:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-05-01 21:19 ` Kirsher, Jeffrey T
2020-05-01 21:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-05-18 15:07 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-05-18 15:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-05-18 15:30 ` Vaibhav Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200501205803.GA129132@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox