public inbox for linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
To: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lossin@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org,
	ojeda@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] rust: revocable: documentation and refactorings
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:59:25 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250626165927.66498-1-marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com> (raw)

This patch series brings documentation and refactorings to the `Revocable` type.

Changes include:
- Clarifying the write invariant and updating associated safety comments for `Revocable<T>`.
- Splitting the internal `revoke_internal` function into two distinct, explicit functions: `revoke()` (safe, synchronizing with RCU) and `revoke_nosync()` (unsafe, without RCU synchronization), now returning `bool` to indicate revocation status.

Marcelo Moreira (2):
  rust: revocable: Refactor revocation mechanism to remove generic
    revoke_internal
  rust: revocable: Clarify write invariant and update safety comments

Changelog
---------

Changes since v4:
- Rebased the series onto the latest `rfl/rust-next` to integrate recent changes, specifically the `bool` return for `revoke()` and `revoke_nosync()`.
- Dropped the "rust: revocable: simplify RevocableGuard for internal safety" patch, as the approach of using a direct reference (`&'a T`) for `RevocableGuard` was found to be unsound due to Rust's aliasing rules and LLVM's `dereferencable` attribute guarantees, which require references to remain valid for the entire function call duration, even if the internal RCU guard is dropped earlier.
- Refined the `PinnedDrop::drop` `SAFETY` comment based on Benno Lossin's and Miguel Ojeda's feedback, adopting a more concise and standard Kernel-style bullet point format.
- Corrected a duplicated line in the commit message of the second patch.

Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/DAOMIWBZXFO9.U353H8NWTLC5@kernel.org/T/#u

Changes since v3:
- Refined the wording of the `Revocable<T>` invariants to be more precise about read and write validity conditions, specifically including RCU read-side lock acquisition timing for reads and RCU grace period for writes.
- Simplified the `try_access_with_guard` safety comment for better conciseness.
- Refactored `RevocableGuard` to use `&'a T` instead of `*const T`, removing its internal invariants and `unsafe` blocks.
- Simplified `Revocable::try_access` to leverage `try_access_with_guard` and `map`.
- Split `revoke_internal` into `revoke()` and `revoke_nosync()` functions, making synchronization behavior explicit.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/DAOMIWBZXFO9.U353H8NWTLC5@kernel.org/T/#u

Changes in v2:
- Refined the wording of the invariants in `Revocable<T>` to be more direct and address feedback regarding the phrase 'must occur'.
- Added '// INVARIANT:' comments in `try_access` and `try_access_with_guard` as suggested by reviewers.
- Added the missing invariant for `RevocableGuard<'_, T>` regarding the validity of `data_ref`.
- Updated the safety comment in the `Deref` implementation of `RevocableGuard` to refer to the new invariant.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CAPZ3m_jw0LxK1MmseaamNYhj9VY8AXtJ0AOcYd9qcn=5wPE4eA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t

 rust/kernel/revocable.rs | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

base-commit: 0303584766b7bdb6564c7e8f13e0b59b6ef44984

-- 
2.50.0

             reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-26 16:59 Marcelo Moreira [this message]
2025-06-26 16:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] rust: revocable: Refactor revocation mechanism to remove generic revoke_internal Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-03  8:24   ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-26 16:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] rust: revocable: Clarify write invariant and update safety comments Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-01 11:27 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] rust: revocable: documentation and refactorings Alice Ryhl
2025-07-01 11:40   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-01 12:40     ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-03  8:24 ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-05  5:09   ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-05  7:01     ` Benno Lossin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250626165927.66498-1-marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
    --to=marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox