public inbox for linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
To: aliceryhl@google.com, lossin@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org,
	ojeda@kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht
Subject: [PATCH v8 3/3] rust: revocable: Documents RevocableGuard invariants/safety and refine Deref safety
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 15:35:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250726183552.23098-4-marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250726183552.23098-1-marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>

Refinements include:
- `RevocableGuard`'s invariants are updated to precisely state that
  `data_ref` is valid as long as the RCU read-side lock is held.
- The `RevocableGuard::new` constructor is made `unsafe`, explicitly
  requiring callers to guarantee the validity of the raw pointer and
  RCU read-side lock lifetime.
- The `SAFETY` comment in `Revocable::try_access` is refined for
  clarity, now explicitly stating how `Self`'s type invariants
  and the RCU read-side lock together ensure data validity for reads.
- The `Deref` implementation's `SAFETY` comment for `RevocableGuard`
  is refined.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
---
 rust/kernel/revocable.rs | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rust/kernel/revocable.rs b/rust/kernel/revocable.rs
index 6d8e9237dbdf..a2aa7989231a 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/revocable.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/revocable.rs
@@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ pub fn new(data: impl PinInit<T>) -> impl PinInit<Self> {
     pub fn try_access(&self) -> Option<RevocableGuard<'_, T>> {
         let guard = rcu::read_lock();
         if self.is_available.load(Ordering::Relaxed) {
-            // Since `self.is_available` is true, data is initialised and has to remain valid
-            // because the RCU read side lock prevents it from being dropped.
-            Some(RevocableGuard::new(self.data.get(), guard))
+            // SAFETY: `self.data` is valid for reads because of `Self`'s type invariants:
+            // `self.is_available` is true and the RCU read-side lock is held by `guard`.
+            Some(unsafe { RevocableGuard::new(self.data.get(), guard) })
         } else {
             None
         }
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ fn drop(self: Pin<&mut Self>) {
 ///
 /// # Invariants
 ///
-/// The RCU read-side lock is held while the guard is alive.
+/// - `data_ref` is a valid pointer for as long as the RCU read-side lock is held.
 pub struct RevocableGuard<'a, T> {
     // This can't use the `&'a T` type because references that appear in function arguments must
     // not become dangling during the execution of the function, which can happen if the
@@ -245,7 +245,13 @@ pub struct RevocableGuard<'a, T> {
 }
 
 impl<T> RevocableGuard<'_, T> {
-    fn new(data_ref: *const T, rcu_guard: rcu::Guard) -> Self {
+    /// Creates a new `RevocableGuard`.
+    ///
+    /// # Safety
+    ///
+    /// Callers must ensure that `data_ref` is a valid pointer to a `T` object,
+    /// and that it remains valid for as long as the returned `RevocableGuard` is alive.
+    unsafe fn new(data_ref: *const T, rcu_guard: rcu::Guard) -> Self {
         Self {
             data_ref,
             _rcu_guard: rcu_guard,
@@ -258,8 +264,8 @@ impl<T> Deref for RevocableGuard<'_, T> {
     type Target = T;
 
     fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
-        // SAFETY: By the type invariants, we hold the rcu read-side lock, so the object is
-        // guaranteed to remain valid.
+        // SAFETY: `self.data_ref` is valid because of `Self`'s type invariants,
+        // and the active RCU read-side lock held via `_rcu_guard`, ensuring the data's accessibility.
         unsafe { &*self.data_ref }
     }
 }
-- 
2.50.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-26 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-26 18:35 [PATCH v8 0/3] rust: revocable: Documentation, refactoring and safety refinements Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-26 18:35 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] rust: revocable: Clarify write invariant and update safety comments Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-26 18:35 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] rust: revocable: Refactor revocation mechanism to remove generic revoke_internal Marcelo Moreira
2025-07-26 18:35 ` Marcelo Moreira [this message]
2025-08-12  1:03   ` [PATCH v8 3/3] rust: revocable: Documents RevocableGuard invariants/safety and refine Deref safety Marcelo Moreira
2025-11-03 10:36   ` Benno Lossin
2025-08-18 22:07 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] rust: revocable: Documentation, refactoring and safety refinements Marcelo Moreira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250726183552.23098-4-marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
    --to=marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox