From: James Flowers <bold.zone2373@fastmail.com>
To: harry.wentland@amd.com, sunpeng.li@amd.com, siqueira@igalia.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, roman.li@amd.com,
alvin.lee2@amd.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: James Flowers <bold.zone2373@fastmail.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Use kmalloc_array() instead of kmalloc()
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 22:19:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250913052109.2638-1-bold.zone2373@fastmail.com> (raw)
Documentation/process/deprecated.rst recommends against the use of kmalloc
with dynamic size calculations due to the risk of overflow and smaller
allocation being made than the caller was expecting. This could lead to
buffer overflow in code similar to the memcpy in
amdgpu_dm_plane_add_modifier().
Signed-off-by: James Flowers <bold.zone2373@fastmail.com>
---
I see that in amdgpu_dm_plane_get_plane_modifiers, capacity is initialized to
only 128, but it is probably preferable to refactor.
Tested on a Steam Deck OLED with no apparent regressions using these test suites from
igt-gpu-tools:
1) kms_plane
2) amd_plane
3) amd_fuzzing
4) testdisplay
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c
index b7c6e8d13435..b587d2033f0b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_plane_add_modifier(uint64_t **mods, uint64_t *size, uint64
if (*cap - *size < 1) {
uint64_t new_cap = *cap * 2;
- uint64_t *new_mods = kmalloc(new_cap * sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+ uint64_t *new_mods = kmalloc_array(new_cap, sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_mods) {
kfree(*mods);
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static int amdgpu_dm_plane_get_plane_modifiers(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsig
if (adev->family < AMDGPU_FAMILY_AI)
return 0;
- *mods = kmalloc(capacity * sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+ *mods = kmalloc_array(capacity, sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL);
if (plane_type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR) {
amdgpu_dm_plane_add_modifier(mods, &size, &capacity, DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR);
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-13 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-13 5:19 James Flowers [this message]
2025-09-15 21:45 ` [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Use kmalloc_array() instead of kmalloc() Alex Deucher
2025-09-16 4:08 ` Alex Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250913052109.2638-1-bold.zone2373@fastmail.com \
--to=bold.zone2373@fastmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alvin.lee2@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.li@amd.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=siqueira@igalia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox