From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
syzbot+ad45f827c88778ff7df6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
frank.li@vivo.com, glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
slava@dubeyko.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@gmail.com,
khalid@kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/super: fix memory leak of s_fs_info on setup_bdev_super failure
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:55:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251118165553.GF2441659@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118163509.GE2441659@ZenIV>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 04:35:09PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> For HFS I would expect that hfs_fill_super() would call hfs_mdb_put(sb)
> on all failures and have it called from subsequent ->put_super() if
> we succeed and later unmount the filesystem. That seems to be where
> ->s_fs_info is taken out of superblock and freed.
>
> What do you observe getting leaked and in which case does that happen?
AFAICS, the problem is with aca740cecbe5 "fs: open block device after superblock
creation" where you get a failure exit stuck between getting a new superblock
from sget_fc() and calling fill_super().
That is where the gap has been introduced. I see two possible solutions:
one is to have failure of setup_bdev_super() (and only it) steal ->s_fs_info
back, on the theory that filesystem didn't have a chance to do anything
yet. Another is to move the call of hfs_mdb_put() from failure exits of
hfs_fill_super() *and* from hfs_put_super() into hfs_kill_sb(), that
would do that:
generic_shutdown_super(sb);
hfs_mdb_put(sb);
if (sb->s_bdev) {
sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev);
bdev_fput(sb->s_bdev_file);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 16:52 [PATCH] fs/super: fix memory leak of s_fs_info on setup_bdev_super failure Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-11-18 14:59 ` Al Viro
2025-11-18 16:21 ` Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-11-18 16:35 ` Al Viro
2025-11-18 16:55 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-11-18 18:05 ` Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-11-18 17:58 ` Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa
2025-11-26 14:01 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251118165553.GF2441659@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=khalid@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=syzbot+ad45f827c88778ff7df6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox