From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B53C6EACD; Sat, 22 Aug 2026 01:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787363589; cv=none; b=tFA/I1B9L6ftpt+550LogOTXhfdMz3nh0rZqTdhztjCwfal3V317YRNaDW0ytNlT1JuHMzi1j3NqG/3VIeWfrux9fDrVWMep/LokWPIzk00js0vvBAIA0HM0GdsOMOuoCFAU0paVffGYP9qGtIW3WS/X9/lSaTz20N78oGKrkxM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787363589; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ld8edAAE290f6pTB61Ojvi2TndIAg4rh2NxNrOD03Gc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qF7RWwzfZcSoQedsFdeWrVpAvxdXkd6eLVuUXoMcyP/n6CgoA7aXlFyDPvqSCq3xfaeawwnbzpAo2SkFB/RYX4zEE+pWiVT9ojDp9lcGnobhw2dN9dBGULlIqEeXrQHlTZsMicKZcHA2Q1s4/qXpCvvqXh3trqahEE2YPp2iFZA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ieT7dW6w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ieT7dW6w" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DF841F000E9; Sat, 22 Aug 2026 01:53:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787363584; bh=r6MeiXWgK9DpR7Y+4isrivMRsxGTBKFAoVGptDSos5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ieT7dW6w3OkQuWfBAQKTtPZPTpg90bxDha0KwIkrNyVQbPsdF083ruXXnO9o0DeFn Xca1sGMvkTmzkhsC3GcXjDoiARuEO71yOeV5yTP4sXqQ4n2ZPp44Pa/MW4kgY5LeZM CVXXq1R76bsjyQ+zF64GiZNHBhEF/LJLHyrvw6XNFyMtE27y5HPo/HQIh1BpQEARv2 IvWmw2F2OdRHK/noLVcyJb1WXNoQQ5lfZE3+nvaHSztAgyJLFJXv+6OgoYdQ7J7q1q 1huT2s4dnTVTI7XqJpBtUc5NErVeuKaK3TufPVm7fzFdOohdYZ9Bunk+FJ2A4EEBTs C3w8ddl1+MyTA== Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 02:52:58 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Marco Chen Cc: Joshua Crofts , dan@dlrobertson.com, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, jagathjog1996@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iio: accel: bma400: remove completed tasks from TODO list Message-ID: <20260822025258.428c4db9@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260813150103.56350-1-marcochen.dev@gmail.com> <20260817161523.00001feb@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:37:49 -0400 Marco Chen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 04:15:23PM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: > > > Strange that these weren't removed in the commits that introduce said > > changes... Anyhow, not sure if this patch on its own is too much churn, > > Jonathan and the other usually prefer these to go in a series of more > > changes (i.e. if you do the power management TODO, you send this patch > > in the series). This is up to Jonathan however. In this case it is tidying up now incorrect documentation. I'm fine with doing that on it's own. Hence applied. > > That makes sense. I will resend this patch as part of a power management > series instead of an individual patch like I did here. I have ordered > a bma400 and I am reading the kernel docs on runtime PM and other IIO > drivers on how they implement it. > > To Jonathan, do you have a preference on how the power management > series should be structured? Sorry - I'm way behind on review so not going to have time to look at the datasheet or driver for a few weeks at least. Perhaps share a proposal and we can look at it on list. Jonathan > >