From: Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri <bhanuseshukumar@gmail.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khalid@kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: dmaengine: add explanation for phys field in dma_async_tx_descriptor structure
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 22:25:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4aef483f-df7f-420a-abba-b2fc27db0105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251113064937.8735-1-bhanuseshukumar@gmail.com>
On 13/11/25 12:19, Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri wrote:
> Describe the need to initialize the phys field in the dma_async_tx_descriptor
> structure during its initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri <bhanuseshukumar@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst
> index 1594598b3..f4ed98f70 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/provider.rst
> @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ supported.
> - This structure can be initialized using the function
> ``dma_async_tx_descriptor_init``.
>
> - - You'll also need to set two fields in this structure:
> + - You'll also need to set following fields in this structure:
>
> - flags:
> TODO: Can it be modified by the driver itself, or
> @@ -421,6 +421,9 @@ supported.
> that is supposed to push the current transaction descriptor to a
> pending queue, waiting for issue_pending to be called.
>
> + - phys: Physical address of the descriptor which is used later by
> + the dma engine to read the descriptor and initiate transfer.
> +
> - In this structure the function pointer callback_result can be
> initialized in order for the submitter to be notified that a
> transaction has completed. In the earlier code the function pointer
Hi,
I just wanted to check if you had a chance to review it or if any changes are needed from my side.
Regards,
Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 6:49 [PATCH] docs: dmaengine: add explanation for phys field in dma_async_tx_descriptor structure Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri
2025-11-24 16:55 ` Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri [this message]
2025-11-26 3:27 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-12-16 16:59 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4aef483f-df7f-420a-abba-b2fc27db0105@gmail.com \
--to=bhanuseshukumar@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khalid@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox