From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C6B55C33 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708378625; cv=none; b=l6kcn+Fz7ZeNaTgy6ChpsDgfpsjl2bUtchXiDRPdVyGYlLOr2FdA2j/QHVLIISaSdlWAU/OtGX6KE5cDDHz9A8UsmW0Y8vowfZjs/VIxCUKMsIFeQF7zTL9LuAqYA36FBKoFicJ/45F2OfXiQ2p5WfpGABx2pYiwwF5/P4eNCaw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708378625; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ahsEsL7xHvY6JXEf8G+tqpCCQDD6851+Q0sh4rCn0ys=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ggDUyLsSj0g33z+orFB9bsQdrG7lHr8ljDYQrIbIlCma8DtgrDv/KmxlbPlNFKQmYH12853wCr/x1AENGOMav/G3NDKqarPAr0mNr8A2X8epv92P/Jb8wATBPTB699eQTEHqaodHfIjZzO9aCxkFS1C0rEUGoeMGoZVFSGtbAew= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=XmyZzi7k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="XmyZzi7k" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CCD4088A for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.1 X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pr9katRyHRKM for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=45.79.88.28; helo=ms.lwn.net; envelope-from=corbet@lwn.net; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org DCF6040800 Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org DCF6040800 Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20201203 header.b=XmyZzi7k Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF6040800 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 21:37:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 815005A270 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1708378616; bh=tnu9wEn1IsHkV2rTmIJegZNLUksL15hxtWNasU0E/Iw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XmyZzi7kg2wIqtIdQhpf4g6cHpb1jXsEqxtxPG4zcbM1Ff4PsE4ryDahnMh+eG+73 Kd9x1K0UXFFzXQg4c2WVDwqNAebLvmQ10VNnGP43rlfOlevRg1a83wcB6YhoOXJ7+4 R6zKTMdETIJiP3RdlfmA6HSmtLv3TMAvx2FOW99o6jGL+/JiPX2Imtmg0Vu4SQhmnd QCL/GOiu/epy6DDJFzw/5Pw6HkrHHgERCDt5foocv31jWz8HzJI7CcMHcwdfRK3+CO QV13L0uzK2q9vRJBCjKVoM78v4mlBf0ls9pT3fsFQrXZNyWLiE0rwLq9xdCvMOJqlI +itUmEOb5QQ9Q== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::646]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 815005A270; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 21:36:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Lukas Bulwahn , "Ran.Park" Cc: ricardo@marliere.net, akinobu.mita@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed case issue with 'fault-injection' in documentation In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:36:55 -0700 Message-ID: <87zfvwm8zs.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lukas Bulwahn writes: > Ricardo suggests that: > > - you run 'make htmldocs' before applying the patch and check for the > existing warnings. > > - you run 'make cleandocs' and 'make htmldocs' after applying the > patch and check for the existing warnings. > > Did any warning disappear or appear due to your patch? Were you > motivated by a specific warning you observed during the build and you > addressing that? > > So, for starters: did you already try 'make htmldocs' with your patch > applied? What did you observe? This all seems like a bit much for what is essentially a typo fix. I would be amazed if it changed the build in any way other than making the case more consistent; there's no need to do all that stuff. I've applied it, thanks. jon