public inbox for linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] usb: serial: fix: trainling statements `break` should be on next line
@ 2025-10-04  8:01 vivekyadav1207731111
  2025-10-06 12:13 ` Johan Hovold
  2025-10-07  1:16 ` David Hunter
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: vivekyadav1207731111 @ 2025-10-04  8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: johan, gregkh
  Cc: linux-usb, linux-kernel, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees,
	david.hunter.linux, Vivek Yadav

From: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com>

Run `checkpatch.pl` script on path `drivers/usb/serial/*`
Find ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line

Doesn't claim any functionality changes in any of the modified
file.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c b/drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c
index 2bce8cc03aca..41b80a075b87 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c
@@ -153,16 +153,17 @@ static int mct_u232_calculate_baud_rate(struct usb_serial *serial,
 		   divider = 115200/value;
 		   real baud = 115200/divider */
 		switch (value) {
-		case 300: break;
-		case 600: break;
-		case 1200: break;
-		case 2400: break;
-		case 4800: break;
-		case 9600: break;
-		case 19200: break;
-		case 38400: break;
-		case 57600: break;
-		case 115200: break;
+		case 300:
+		case 600:
+		case 1200:
+		case 2400:
+		case 4800:
+		case 9600:
+		case 19200:
+		case 38400:
+		case 57600:
+		case 115200:
+			break;
 		default:
 			value = 9600;
 			*result = 9600;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] usb: serial: fix: trainling statements `break` should be on next line
  2025-10-04  8:01 [PATCH] usb: serial: fix: trainling statements `break` should be on next line vivekyadav1207731111
@ 2025-10-06 12:13 ` Johan Hovold
  2025-10-06 17:55   ` vivek yadav
  2025-10-07  1:16 ` David Hunter
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hovold @ 2025-10-06 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vivekyadav1207731111
  Cc: gregkh, linux-usb, linux-kernel, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees,
	david.hunter.linux

On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 01:31:23PM +0530, vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com>
> 
> Run `checkpatch.pl` script on path `drivers/usb/serial/*`

Same here, don't do that.

Johan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] usb: serial: fix: trainling statements `break` should be on next line
  2025-10-06 12:13 ` Johan Hovold
@ 2025-10-06 17:55   ` vivek yadav
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: vivek yadav @ 2025-10-06 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johan Hovold
  Cc: gregkh, linux-usb, linux-kernel, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees,
	david.hunter.linux

Hi Johan,
Thanks for giving time for the review of my patch.
I understand your point and will avoid such kind of practice.


~~Vivek

On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 5:43 PM Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 01:31:23PM +0530, vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com>
> >
> > Run `checkpatch.pl` script on path `drivers/usb/serial/*`
>
> Same here, don't do that.
>
> Johan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] usb: serial: fix: trainling statements `break` should be on next line
  2025-10-04  8:01 [PATCH] usb: serial: fix: trainling statements `break` should be on next line vivekyadav1207731111
  2025-10-06 12:13 ` Johan Hovold
@ 2025-10-07  1:16 ` David Hunter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Hunter @ 2025-10-07  1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vivekyadav1207731111, johan, gregkh
  Cc: linux-usb, linux-kernel, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees

On 10/4/25 04:01, vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com wrote:

> +		case 300:
> +		case 600:
> +		case 1200:
> +		case 2400:
> +		case 4800:
> +		case 9600:
> +		case 19200:
> +		case 38400:
> +		case 57600:
> +		case 115200:
> +			break;

It is generally considered best practice to use the breaks after each
case. Here is a good article on this:

https://lwn.net/Articles/794944/


Also, same here. no top-posting:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-07  1:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-04  8:01 [PATCH] usb: serial: fix: trainling statements `break` should be on next line vivekyadav1207731111
2025-10-06 12:13 ` Johan Hovold
2025-10-06 17:55   ` vivek yadav
2025-10-07  1:16 ` David Hunter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox