From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>
To: "Marcelo Moreira" <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
Cc: <dakr@kernel.org>, <ojeda@kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
<~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] rust: revocable: update write invariant and fix safety comments
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 20:05:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DAMGEMZF6UC9.1YB4QHDZIW5PS@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPZ3m_hQF+ZHdfWTVZ3Z3dJoMu37Q8YcSecKi=fv1s3dw6UTSA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu Jun 12, 2025 at 9:22 PM CEST, Marcelo Moreira wrote:
> Em qui., 12 de jun. de 2025 às 06:02, Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> escreveu:
>> On Tue Jun 3, 2025 at 1:26 AM CEST, Marcelo Moreira wrote:
>> > + // and because this `PinnedDrop` context (having `&mut Self`) guarantees exclusive access,
>> > + // ensuring no other thread can concurrently access or revoke `data`.
>> > + // This ensures `data` is valid for `drop_in_place`.
>>
>> This last sentence is not needed. Instead, we should mention that since
>> this is a `drop` function, we're only called once, so it's fine to call
>> drop (since that also is only allowed to be called once).
>>
>
> ok, I thought of something like:
>
> // SAFETY: `self.data` is valid for writes because of `Self`'s type invariants.
> // The `&mut Self` context guarantees exclusive access and a single
> call to `drop`,
Let's mention that no thread can access `data` *because* of the
exclusive reference.
> // making `self.data` valid for `drop_in_place`.
The part about drop should be separate. We usually use bullet points for
that.
---
Cheers,
Benno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-14 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 23:26 [PATCH v4 0/3] rust: revocable: documentation and refactorings Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-02 23:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] rust: revocable: update write invariant and fix safety comments Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-12 9:02 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 19:22 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-14 18:05 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-06-14 23:11 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-15 8:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-16 0:36 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-16 7:15 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-17 2:49 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-17 7:18 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-26 16:59 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-13 14:08 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-02 23:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] rust: revocable: simplify RevocableGuard for internal safety Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-12 9:04 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 9:28 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-12 9:52 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 18:52 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-14 18:04 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-13 14:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-14 17:00 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-02 23:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] rust: revocable: split revoke_internal into revoke and revoke_nosync Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-12 9:06 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 19:29 ` Marcelo Moreira
2025-06-13 14:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-16 10:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] rust: revocable: documentation and refactorings Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-16 19:33 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DAMGEMZF6UC9.1YB4QHDZIW5PS@kernel.org \
--to=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox