From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF64CC00140 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A90F422AD; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 7A90F422AD Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=pPEOsM58 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZhxNx3TeQ8z; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A8B41BE3; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 46A8B41BE3 Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF92C0035; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7765AC002D for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518E241198 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 518E241198 Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=pPEOsM58 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lej7iVPcnsI for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 679334014B Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 679334014B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A04615FB; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33DECC433D6; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:40:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1658853621; bh=SqugJWMS0G3TH6g4CPPFAQmpuiXRP4YIautk74KGKR8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pPEOsM587tS/xIay3ZUHlfGxy9/L4Znb20on1v4gJRiMyCq4/x/GhieD6rjJ8T6EY PR2oXMu68VV0nqkMf8HNX03jqgs2xo7+wLhpdmwU9hEzKdvZI7jSKZeVAvFgijQs2S lY1BJtR9LE2ByL28lHKroDNXMOtJZZygVa8W4NiA= Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 18:40:19 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Soumya Negi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntfs: Ensure $Extend is a directory Message-ID: References: <20220724132107.1163-1-soumya.negi97@gmail.com> <20220724153448.GA2608@Negi> <20220724221745.GB2608@Negi> <20220725190656.GA14927@Negi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220725190656.GA14927@Negi> Cc: linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anton Altaparmakov X-BeenThere: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-kernel-mentees-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Linux-kernel-mentees" On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 12:06:56PM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 03:17:45PM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 05:54:43PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:34:48AM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 03:47:01PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 06:21:07AM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote: > > > > > > Fixes Syzbot bug: kernel BUG in ntfs_lookup_inode_by_name > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=32cf53b48c1846ffc25a185a2e92e170d1a95d71 > > > > > > > > > > > > Check whether $Extend is a directory or not( for NTFS3.0+) while loading > > > > > > system files. If it isn't(as in the case of this bug where the mft record for > > > > > > $Extend contains a regular file), load_system_files() returns false. > > > > > > > > > > Please wrap your changelog text at 72 columns like your editor asked you > > > > > to when writing this :) > > > > > > > > I will correct the changelog(Don't think I can wrap the bug report > > > > link. Checkpatch will still give a warning. Is that okay?). > > > > > > Yes, do not wrap links. > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+30b7f850c6d98ea461d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Soumya Negi > > > > > > > > > > What commit caused this problem? What Fixes: tag should go here? > > > > > > > > I don't think this was caused by any specific commit.The $Extend > > > > directory check is not present in any previous releases. Syzbot has > > > > also not been able to produce a cause bisection for the bug. So no fixes > > > > tag(please correct me if I am wrong). > > > > > > > > > Should it go to stable kernels? If so, how far back? > > > > > > > > Since the NTFS extension file was new to NTFS 3.0, perhaps the patch > > > > should apply all the way back to the first release with NTFS3.0 support? > > > > > Yes, mark it there. > > > > Thanks. I will send v2 of the patch. Just want to make sure that the > > patch will apply to 2.6.11.y before marking it. > > 2.6.11 is where I think NTFS3.0 support was first present and till where > the patch should go. But I am not able to build 2.6.11 on my system and > test the patch. I tried the patch on 4.14 and it works. Should I mark it > to be backported till 4.14 instead? Say 4.9 and you will get an email saying it failed to apply there when it gets merged into Linus's tree, and then you can provide a working patch for us to add to stable. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees