Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Fix seqcount lockdep assertion in cgroup freezer

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 04:00:22PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 05:15:55PM +0530, Nirbhay Sharma <nirbhay.lkd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The commit afa3701c0e45 ("cgroup: cgroup.stat.local time accounting")
> > introduced a seqcount to track freeze timing but initialized it as a
> > plain seqcount_t using seqcount_init().
> > 
> > However, the write-side critical section in cgroup_do_freeze() holds
> > the css_set_lock spinlock while calling write_seqcount_begin(). On
> > PREEMPT_RT kernels, spinlocks do not disable preemption, causing the
> > lockdep assertion for a plain seqcount_t, which checks for preemption
> > being disabled, to fail.
> > 
> > This triggers the following warning:
> >   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9692 at include/linux/seqlock.h:221
> > 
> > Fix this by changing the type to seqcount_spinlock_t and initializing
> > it with seqcount_spinlock_init() to associate css_set_lock with the
> > seqcount. This allows lockdep to correctly validate that the spinlock
> > is held during write operations, resolving the assertion failure on all
> > kernel configurations.
> > 
> > Reported-by: syzbot+27a2519eb4dad86d0156@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=27a2519eb4dad86d0156
> > Fixes: afa3701c0e45 ("cgroup: cgroup.stat.local time accounting")
> > Signed-off-by: Nirbhay Sharma <nirbhay.lkd@gmail.com>
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251002165510.KtY3IT--@linutronix.de/
> 
> Yes, this is what was discussed yesterday. Thanks.
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>

Okay, reverting that one and applying this one.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun