From: Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/user_events: Avoid taking address of packed member in perf_test
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 22:28:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQD2Igc3svAF3klc@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027162521.c56c7f89f6ad4e3d639c408c@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 04:25:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:04:39 +0530 Ankit Khushwaha <ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Accessing 'reg.write_index' directly triggers a -Waddress-of-packed-member
> > warning due to potential unaligned pointer access:
> >
> > perf_test.c:239:38: warning: taking address of packed member 'write_index'
> > of class or structure 'user_reg' may result in an unaligned pointer value
> > [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
> > 239 | ASSERT_NE(-1, write(self->data_fd, ®.write_index,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Use memcpy() instead to safely copy the value and avoid unaligned pointer
> > access across architectures.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/user_events/perf_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/user_events/perf_test.c
> > @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ TEST_F(user, perf_empty_events) {
> > struct perf_event_mmap_page *perf_page;
> > int page_size = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > int id, fd;
> > + __u32 write_index;
> > __u32 *val;
> >
> > reg.size = sizeof(reg);
> > @@ -236,7 +237,8 @@ TEST_F(user, perf_empty_events) {
> > ASSERT_EQ(1 << reg.enable_bit, self->check);
> >
> > /* Ensure write shows up at correct offset */
> > - ASSERT_NE(-1, write(self->data_fd, ®.write_index,
> > + memcpy(&write_index, ®.write_index, sizeof(reg.write_index));
> > + ASSERT_NE(-1, write(self->data_fd, &write_index,
> > sizeof(reg.write_index)));
>
> Simply casting &write_index to void* would fix this?
yes, this hides the type mismatch from the compiler. But i think
casting to void * will not fix the alignment mismatch for packed struct.
It works on x86, but might break on other platform.
>
> > val = (void *)(((char *)perf_page) + perf_page->data_offset);
> > ASSERT_EQ(PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE, *val);
Thanks
Ankit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 11:34 [PATCH] selftests/user_events: Avoid taking address of packed member in perf_test Ankit Khushwaha
2025-10-27 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-28 16:58 ` Ankit Khushwaha [this message]
2025-10-28 20:26 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-29 15:20 ` Ankit Khushwaha
2025-11-01 3:19 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQD2Igc3svAF3klc@fedora \
--to=ankitkhushwaha.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox