Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] riscv: introduce asm/swab.h

[Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>]

On 03/04/2025 21:34, Ignacio Encinas wrote:
> Implement endianness swap macros for RISC-V.
> 
> Use the rev8 instruction when Zbb is available. Otherwise, rely on the
> default mask-and-shift implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ignacio Encinas <ignacio@iencinas.com>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/swab.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/swab.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/swab.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7352e8405a99
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/swab.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_SWAB_H
> +#define _ASM_RISCV_SWAB_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature-macros.h>
> +#include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/swab.h>
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && !defined(NO_ALTERNATIVE)
> +
> +#define ARCH_SWAB(size) \
> +static __always_inline unsigned long __arch_swab##size(__u##size value) \
> +{									\
> +	unsigned long x = value;					\
> +									\
> +	if (riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB)) {            \
> +		asm volatile (".option push\n"				\
> +			      ".option arch,+zbb\n"			\
> +			      "rev8 %0, %1\n"				\
> +			      ".option pop\n"				\
> +			      : "=r" (x) : "r" (x));			\
> +		return x >> (BITS_PER_LONG - size);			\
> +	}                                                               \
> +	return  ___constant_swab##size(value);				\
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +ARCH_SWAB(64)
> +#define __arch_swab64 __arch_swab64
> +#endif
> +
> +ARCH_SWAB(32)
> +#define __arch_swab32 __arch_swab32
> +
> +ARCH_SWAB(16)
> +#define __arch_swab16 __arch_swab16
> +
> +#undef ARCH_SWAB
> +
> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && !defined(NO_ALTERNATIVE) */
> +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SWAB_H */
> 

I was having a look at this as well, using the alternatives macros.

It would be nice to have a __zbb_swab defined so that you could do some
time checks with this, because it would be interesting to see the
benchmark of how much these improve byteswapping.

How about:

#define ARCH_SWAB(size) \
static __always_inline unsigned long __zbb_swab##size(__u##size value) \
{								\
	unsigned long x = value;				\
								\
	asm volatile (".option push\n"				\
		      ".option arch,+zbb\n"			\
		      "rev8 %0, %1\n"				\
		      ".option pop\n"				\
		      : "=r" (x) : "r" (x));			\
	return x >> (BITS_PER_LONG - size);			\
}                                                               \
								\
static __always_inline unsigned long __arch_swab##size(__u##size value) \
	if (riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB))       \
		return  __zbb_swab##size(value)			\
	return ___constant_swab##size(value);			\	


We might need to define  __zbb_swab##size to BUG or something if it
isn't available.

Also, I wonder if it is possible to say to the build system we must
have ZBB therefore only emit ZBB for cases where you are building a
kernel for an known ZBB system.



-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html