From: Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri <bhanuseshukumar@gmail.com>
To: Khalid Aziz <khalid@kernel.org>,
Thangaraj Samynathan <Thangaraj.S@microchip.com>,
Rengarajan Sundararajan <Rengarajan.S@microchip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: lan78xx: Fix lost EEPROM write timeout error(-ETIMEDOUT) in lan78xx_write_raw_eeprom
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 11:42:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8311311-61bd-4be6-8025-841b84ff4422@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <866d28f8-616c-4a79-9030-2ebc971e73fd@kernel.org>
On 07/10/25 00:30, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On 10/3/25 10:07 PM, Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri wrote:
>> The function lan78xx_write_raw_eeprom failed to properly propagate EEPROM
>> write timeout errors (-ETIMEDOUT). In the timeout fallthrough path, it first
>> attempted to restore the pin configuration for LED outputs and then
>> returned only the status of that restore operation, discarding the
>> original timeout error saved in ret.
>>
>> As a result, callers could mistakenly treat EEPROM write operation as
>> successful even though the EEPROM write had actually timed out with no
>> or partial data write.
>>
>> To fix this, handle errors in restoring the LED pin configuration separately.
>> If the restore succeeds, return any prior EEPROM write timeout error saved
>> in ret to the caller.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
>> Fixes: 8b1b2ca83b20 ("net: usb: lan78xx: Improve error handling in EEPROM and OTP operations")
>> Signed-off-by: Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri <bhanuseshukumar@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Note:
>> The patch is compiled and tested.
>> The patch was suggested by Oleksij Rempel while reviewing a fix to a bug
>> found by syzbot earlier.
>> The review mail chain where this fix was suggested is given below.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/aNzojoXK-m1Tn6Lc@pengutronix.de/
>>
>> drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 11 +++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> index d75502ebbc0d..5ccbe6ae2ebe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> @@ -1174,10 +1174,13 @@ static int lan78xx_write_raw_eeprom(struct lan78xx_net *dev, u32 offset,
>> }
>> write_raw_eeprom_done:
>> - if (dev->chipid == ID_REV_CHIP_ID_7800_)
>> - return lan78xx_write_reg(dev, HW_CFG, saved);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + if (dev->chipid == ID_REV_CHIP_ID_7800_) {
>> + int rc = lan78xx_write_reg(dev, HW_CFG, saved);
>> + /* If USB fails, there is nothing to do */
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> static int lan78xx_read_raw_otp(struct lan78xx_net *dev, u32 offset,
>
> You were able to test the change to read eeprom code by forcing a timeout while doing probe on EVB-LAN7800LC. Were you able to test this code change the same way just to make sure callers of the write function handle the new ETIMEDOUT return value correctly?
>
> Thanks,
Hi Khalid,
This function is only invoked from user's ethtool operations. The ethtool handles errors returned from the driver callback functions.
I tested it with ethtool -E option by forcing a ETIMEDOUT error early in the lan78xx_write_raw_eeprom temporarily. The ethtool
reported error with "Cannot set EEPROM data" message. The ethtool version used is 5.16.
Regards,
Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-04 4:07 [PATCH] net: usb: lan78xx: Fix lost EEPROM write timeout error(-ETIMEDOUT) in lan78xx_write_raw_eeprom Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri
2025-10-04 5:51 ` Greg KH
2025-10-09 5:38 ` Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri
2025-10-06 19:00 ` Khalid Aziz
2025-10-07 6:12 ` Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-09 5:30 Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri
2025-10-09 5:41 ` Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri
2025-10-09 8:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-09 8:32 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-12 17:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8311311-61bd-4be6-8025-841b84ff4422@gmail.com \
--to=bhanuseshukumar@gmail.com \
--cc=Rengarajan.S@microchip.com \
--cc=Thangaraj.S@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=khalid@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox