From: Woradorn Laodhanadhaworn <woradorn.laon@gmail.com>
To: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xs4all.nl>, rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, me@brighamcampbell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use seq_buf for string concatenation
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 15:18:08 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea5c9577-5d16-435b-9e1c-aa562a1cc6d9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70408559.2499685.1782062190117@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl>
On 22/6/2569 BE 00:16, Jori Koolstra wrote:
>
>> Op 20-06-2026 19:54 CEST schreef Woradorn Laodhanadhaworn <woradorn.laon@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>> In preparation for removing the strlcat API[1],
>> replace the string concatenation logic with a struct seq_buf,
>> which tracks the current position and the remaining space internally.
>>
>> The backing buffer bootup_event_buf allocation is unchanged.
>> Use seq_buf_str() to NUL-terminate before passing to early_enable_events().
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/370 [1]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Woradorn Laodhanadhaworn <woradorn.laon@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> index c46e623e7e0d..15164723e028 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>> #include <linux/sort.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/seq_buf.h>
>>
>> #include <trace/events/sched.h>
>> #include <trace/syscall.h>
>> @@ -4501,13 +4502,23 @@ extern struct trace_event_call *__start_ftrace_events[];
>> extern struct trace_event_call *__stop_ftrace_events[];
>>
>> static char bootup_event_buf[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE] __initdata;
>
> Isn't this now unused?
>
>> +static struct seq_buf bootup_event_seq;
>> +static bool bootup_event_seq_initialized;
>>
>
> I think this can be refactored to avoid the bool. And should bootup_event_seq not be
> __initdata?
>
>> static __init int setup_trace_event(char *str)
>> {
>> - if (bootup_event_buf[0] != '\0')
>> - strlcat(bootup_event_buf, ",", COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
>> + if (!bootup_event_seq_initialized) {
>> + seq_buf_init(&bootup_event_seq, bootup_event_buf, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
>> + bootup_event_seq_initialized = true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (seq_buf_used(&bootup_event_seq) > 0)
>> + seq_buf_puts(&bootup_event_seq, ",");
>>
>> - strlcat(bootup_event_buf, str, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
>> + seq_buf_puts(&bootup_event_seq, str);
>> +
>> + if (seq_buf_has_overflowed(&bootup_event_seq))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> trace_set_ring_buffer_expanded(NULL);
>> disable_tracing_selftest("running event tracing");
>> @@ -4766,7 +4777,7 @@ static __init int event_trace_enable(void)
>> */
>> __trace_early_add_events(tr);
>>
>> - early_enable_events(tr, bootup_event_buf, false);
>> + early_enable_events(tr, (char *)seq_buf_str(&bootup_event_seq), false);
>
> What if trace_event is empty? Then setup_trace_event does not run AFAIK. See the
> WARN_ON in seq_buf_str too. Have you tested this?
>
>>
>> trace_printk_start_comm();
>>
>> @@ -4794,7 +4805,7 @@ static __init int event_trace_enable_again(void)
>> if (!tr)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - early_enable_events(tr, bootup_event_buf, true);
>> + early_enable_events(tr, (char *)seq_buf_str(&bootup_event_seq), true);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>
> Thanks,
> Jori.
Thank you, Jori, for your review. I will send v2.
I tested both empty and non-empty trace_event cases with QEMU, and both now boot successfully.
The logs below demonstrate this.
Non-empty trace_event:
qemu-system-x86_64 \
-kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage \
-initrd initramfs.cpio.gz \
-append "console=ttyS0 trace_event=:mod:rproc_qcom_common,:mod:qrtr,:mod:qcom_aoss trace_event=:mod:rproc_qcom_common" \
-nographic \
-m 512M
[ 0.082316] Kernel command line: console=ttyS0 trace_event=:mod:rproc_qcom_common,:mod:qrtr,:mod:qcom_aoss trace_event=:mod:rproc_qcom_common
[ 0.083324] bootup_event_buf: :mod:rproc_qcom_common,:mod:qrtr,:mod:qcom_aoss
[ 0.083413] bootup_event_buf: :mod:rproc_qcom_common,:mod:qrtr,:mod:qcom_aoss,:mod:rproc_qcom_common
[ 0.083689] printk: log buffer data + meta data: 262144 + 917504 = 1179648 bytes
Empty trace_event:
qemu-system-x86_64 \
-kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage \
-initrd initramfs.cpio.gz \
-append "console=ttyS0" \
-nographic \
-m 512M
[ 0.085213] Kernel command line: console=ttyS0
[ 0.086458] printk: log buffer data + meta data: 262144 + 917504 = 1179648 bytes
Thanks,
Woradorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-20 17:54 [PATCH] tracing: Use seq_buf for string concatenation Woradorn Laodhanadhaworn
2026-06-21 17:16 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-06-22 8:18 ` Woradorn Laodhanadhaworn [this message]
2026-06-22 5:20 ` XIAO WU
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea5c9577-5d16-435b-9e1c-aa562a1cc6d9@gmail.com \
--to=woradorn.laon@gmail.com \
--cc=jkoolstra@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=me@brighamcampbell.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox