From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8511C2D0DC for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57FE206DA for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fVT0/zuI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A57FE206DA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-mentees-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F12184DDD; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p47Mz7sHrYDJ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD12838B8; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06356C1D81; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA2C077D for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8B384AC5 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yCTFHUl2BsE8 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com (mail-pj1-f67.google.com [209.85.216.67]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD1684AA7 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id kx11so1467704pjb.4 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:15:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=TbFdMRwsDwrVRhSr4fXNZgyq0tBrF3Naz329XDmz+JQ=; b=fVT0/zuIPIoa3+zheP+Xi4xB9iw8A+Ju2xLq4Amg+9jgoHVb/DtbfAGQRZQnFxjMIz zOjIO2eEV2tSIgvOZjfZ3Q16F/TmlIF+5yvcpuI7dt9MmG8IVlTle8D3W94Y1zkaNwjT jIrKJLr/6mp3FH+EgWMDws/5PmBlsbtT1UaKZfNO7kQk/ReTUUNNYnHyshA6VvHUEatj Yg+aQzwDyEVV0xRN+qrV+yrPC0loOHsBSL/K2OuRPY5iRxpuNkwxlh20PThnKhbFGAh2 xeYeySGCKdDO1oLVc+dCKtQNDShM37mWx3xiW9GU5sQlCdBGFnJ3po4aGjo/k4lzQbat SF9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=TbFdMRwsDwrVRhSr4fXNZgyq0tBrF3Naz329XDmz+JQ=; b=YCzfnVpME0ta/fyMUfiy97slAhoE9W6F1QkzH4T4Jo5zd3QhUgULQQz5DqiF16YU5t Ff4x7c4tlMVViOm9InVZgOUHPyH/6tAqLTFteE0nfoFepXne/VRnQ6/nn7LfxcAzfVQ1 CfLo5JinWfL6FeLwqzq17BW4OfL+PRb4m+fgwULhF3F2FbTZVpifYs0mB/8/C/YdZjST ZJLLS1voxMD3q/CmQYT9F03nOkZSWoU6tENNcgnVFJ7bQZuzpEK0QSX4UrRIAo7Vh1M3 Ld63o+nD2Igwyjj5m8pG1+imU9wzRL0pAFhCSzAi7rxYlb0ZEvNwG2XnL+o1A81Q9vt0 yAdg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgkhGwVfAWIqWe8XogAZUHsRGqo46xlVxX2QfuMKoVgI/1Ykdr sgIrTSIwpxXyB17Y9Jx5z15jdpEnE6o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJncWlLsvGB12dfYWmOfOGkuRhv6SWAyyjOAEhxEQ5ldop6Il/xKZrK9dDCaRlN0Nx8mBEgg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6a81:: with SMTP id u1mr8122549pjj.4.1577819708890; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:15:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:14d:72b1:8920:a2ce:f815:f14d:bfac? ([2804:14d:72b1:8920:a2ce:f815:f14d:bfac]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m45sm4488158pje.32.2019.12.31.11.15.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:15:08 -0800 (PST) To: Jonathan Corbet References: <92be5a49b967ce35a305fc5ccfb3efea3f61a19a.1577681164.git.dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> <20191230121807.3a1f5f38@lwn.net> <47e2ea6e-a808-5012-6f9a-8800fbd3be00@gmail.com> <20191231083213.0786bda1@lwn.net> From: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:15:05 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191231083213.0786bda1@lwn.net> Content-Language: en-US Cc: mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2 2/8] Documentation: nfsroot.txt: convert to ReST X-BeenThere: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-kernel-mentees-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Linux-kernel-mentees" > Changing text in an existing paragraph can > result in line lengths that are inconsistent and ragged, leading to a less > pleasant appearance > and the temptation to "refill" the paragraph so that the > lines are all approximately equal in length. The problem with yielding > to that temptation is that it messes up > the diff output so that you can no longer easily see the actual > text changes that were made. > > Thus, when making such changes, it can be better to not refill the > paragraphs - as, indeed, you did not. But if the result becomes too > difficult to read (as in, it creates lines that are waaaay to long), it > can be good to create a second patch that makes only the cosmetic changes > without any associated text changes. I was suggesting doing that in this > case. > Does that help? Yes, that's better! Thank you. _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees