From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity checks
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:38:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c99e22-7b12-4ac0-863a-b177c8ac1041@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eae3ffbee3c0ba66b4ee872f6bb48ec77ee25609.1751865330.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
On 7/7/25 07:27, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> We are currently checking some things later, and some things
> immediately. Aggregate the checks and avoid ones that need not be made.
>
> Simplify things by aligning lengths immediately. Defer setting the delta
> parameter until later, which removes some duplicate code in the hugetlb
> case.
>
> We can safely perform the checks moved from mremap_to() to
> check_mremap_params() because:
>
> * If we set a new address via vrm_set_new_addr(), then this is guaranteed
> to not overlap nor to position the new VMA past TASK_SIZE, so there's no
> need to check these later.
>
> * We can simply page align lengths immediately. We do not need to check for
> overlap nor TASK_SIZE sanity after hugetlb alignment as this asserts
> addresses are huge-aligned, then huge-aligns lengths, rounding down. This
> means any existing overlap would have already been caught.
>
> Moving things around like this lays the groundwork for subsequent changes
> to permit operations on batches of VMAs.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 5:27 [PATCH 00/10] mm/mremap: permit mremap() move of multiple VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm/mremap: perform some simple cleanups Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 11:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity checks Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 11:38 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm/mremap: put VMA check and prep logic into helper function Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 13:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm/mremap: cleanup post-processing stage of mremap Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 13:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-10 15:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm/mremap: use an explicit uffd failure path for mremap Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-07 7:56 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-07 10:13 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-07 10:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 14:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm/mremap: check remap conditions earlier Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 14:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm/mremap: move remap_is_valid() into check_prep_vma() Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 14:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm/mremap: clean up mlock populate behaviour Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-10 14:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm/mremap: permit mremap() move of multiple VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-09 18:13 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-07-10 10:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-11 8:17 ` Mark Brown
2025-07-11 8:22 ` Mark Brown
2025-07-11 8:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-07 5:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] tools/testing/selftests: extend mremap_test to test multi-VMA mremap Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-07 6:12 ` [PATCH 00/10] mm/mremap: permit mremap() move of multiple VMAs Hugh Dickins
2025-07-07 10:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-07 10:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01c99e22-7b12-4ac0-863a-b177c8ac1041@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).