Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Tony Ambardar" <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Mykola Lysenko" <mykolal@fb.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>, "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Maciej Fijalkowski" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	"Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Yan Zhai" <yan@cloudflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling tc_redirect.c with musl libc
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 02:24:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <031d656c058b4e55ceae56ef49c4e1729b5090f3.1722244708.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1722244708.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com>

Linux 5.1 implemented 64-bit time types and related syscalls to address the
Y2038 problem generally across archs. Userspace handling of Y2038 varies
with the libc however. While musl libc uses 64-bit time across all 32-bit
and 64-bit platforms, GNU glibc uses 64-bit time on 64-bit platforms but
defaults to 32-bit time on 32-bit platforms unless they "opt-in" to 64-bit
time or explicitly use 64-bit syscalls and time structures.

One specific area is the standard setsockopt() call, SO_TIMESTAMPNS option
used for timestamping, and the related output 'struct timespec'. GNU glibc
defaults as above, also exposing the SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW flag to explicitly
use a 64-bit call and 'struct __kernel_timespec'. Since these are not
exposed or needed with musl libc, their use in tc_redirect.c leads to
compile errors building for mips64el/musl:

  tc_redirect.c: In function 'rcv_tstamp':
  tc_redirect.c:425:32: error: 'SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SO_TIMESTAMPNS'?
    425 |             cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
        |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                                SO_TIMESTAMPNS
  tc_redirect.c:425:32: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
  tc_redirect.c: In function 'test_inet_dtime':
  tc_redirect.c:491:49: error: 'SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SO_TIMESTAMPNS'?
    491 |         err = setsockopt(listen_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW,
        |                                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                                                 SO_TIMESTAMPNS

However, using SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW isn't strictly needed, nor is Y2038 being
explicitly tested. The timestamp checks in tc_redirect.c are simple: the
packet receive timestamp is non-zero and processed/handled in less than 5
seconds.

Switch to using the standard setsockopt() call and SO_TIMESTAMPNS option to
ensure compatibility across glibc and musl libc. In the worst-case, there
is a 5-second window 14 years from now where tc_redirect tests may fail on
32-bit systems. However, we should reasonably expect glibc to adopt a
64-bit mandate rather than the current "opt-in" policy before the Y2038
roll-over.

Fixes: ce6f6cffaeaa ("selftests/bpf: Wait for the netstamp_needed_key static key to be turned on")
Fixes: c803475fd8dd ("bpf: selftests: test skb->tstamp in redirect_neigh")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
index 327d51f59142..53b8ffc943dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int set_forwarding(bool enable)
 
 static int __rcv_tstamp(int fd, const char *expected, size_t s, __u64 *tstamp)
 {
-	struct __kernel_timespec pkt_ts = {};
+	struct timespec pkt_ts = {};
 	char ctl[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(pkt_ts))];
 	struct timespec now_ts;
 	struct msghdr msg = {};
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int __rcv_tstamp(int fd, const char *expected, size_t s, __u64 *tstamp)
 
 	cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
 	if (cmsg && cmsg->cmsg_level == SOL_SOCKET &&
-	    cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
+	    cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS)
 		memcpy(&pkt_ts, CMSG_DATA(cmsg), sizeof(pkt_ts));
 
 	pkt_ns = pkt_ts.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC + pkt_ts.tv_nsec;
@@ -537,9 +537,9 @@ static int wait_netstamp_needed_key(void)
 	if (!ASSERT_GE(srv_fd, 0, "start_server"))
 		goto done;
 
-	err = setsockopt(srv_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW,
+	err = setsockopt(srv_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS,
 			 &opt, sizeof(opt));
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setsockopt(SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setsockopt(SO_TIMESTAMPNS)"))
 		goto done;
 
 	cli_fd = connect_to_fd(srv_fd, TIMEOUT_MILLIS);
@@ -621,9 +621,9 @@ static void test_inet_dtime(int family, int type, const char *addr, __u16 port)
 		return;
 
 	/* Ensure the kernel puts the (rcv) timestamp for all skb */
-	err = setsockopt(listen_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW,
+	err = setsockopt(listen_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS,
 			 &opt, sizeof(opt));
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setsockopt(SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "setsockopt(SO_TIMESTAMPNS)"))
 		goto done;
 
 	if (type == SOCK_STREAM) {
-- 
2.34.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-29  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-25 10:35 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] selftests/bpf: Improve libc portability / musl support (part 2) Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] selftests/bpf: Use portable POSIX basename() Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] selftests/bpf: Fix arg parsing in veristat, test_progs Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:09   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27  3:34     ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling test_lru_map.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: Fix C++ compile error from missing _Bool type Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: Fix order-of-include compile errors in lwt_reroute.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:18   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27  3:56     ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix compile if backtrace support missing in libc Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27  3:48     ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 17:50       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix using stdout, stderr as struct field names Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:27   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27  4:22     ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  8:48       ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling tc_redirect.c with musl libc Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] selftests/bpf: Improve libc portability / musl support (part 2) Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] selftests/bpf: Use portable POSIX basename() Tony Ambardar
2024-07-30 20:50     ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-07-29  9:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] selftests/bpf: Fix arg parsing in veristat, test_progs Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling test_lru_map.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] selftests/bpf: Fix C++ compile error from missing _Bool type Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] selftests/bpf: Fix redefinition errors compiling lwt_reroute.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix compile if backtrace support missing in libc Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix using stdout, stderr as struct field names Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29  9:24   ` Tony Ambardar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=031d656c058b4e55ceae56ef49c4e1729b5090f3.1722244708.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com \
    --to=tony.ambardar@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yan@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox