From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kselftest/arm64: Add test coverage for NT_ARM_TLS
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:03:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08a76a19-5e9e-6943-802a-7ed26edf9240@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815133034.231718-2-broonie@kernel.org>
On 8/15/22 14:30, Mark Brown wrote:
> In preparation for extending support for NT_ARM_TLS to cover additional
> TPIDRs add some tests for the existing interface. Do this in a generic
> ptrace test program to provide a place to collect additional tests in
> the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore
> index b9e54417250d..12607c4580c6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/.gitignore
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> +ptrace
> syscall-abi
> tpidr2
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile
> index c8d7f2495eb2..445ac2dac4ee 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/Makefile
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> # Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
>
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS := syscall-abi tpidr2
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS := ptrace syscall-abi tpidr2
>
> include ../../lib.mk
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4cc4d415b2e7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited.
I suppose 2021 -> 2022?
> + */
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <stddef.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/auxv.h>
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#include <sys/ptrace.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/uio.h>
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +
> +#include "../../kselftest.h"
> +
> +#define EXPECTED_TESTS 3
> +
> +#define MAX_TPIDRS 1
> +
> +static bool have_sme(void)
> +{
> + return getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_SME;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_tpidr(pid_t child)
> +{
> + uint64_t read_val[MAX_TPIDRS];
> + uint64_t write_val[MAX_TPIDRS];
> + struct iovec read_iov, write_iov;
> + int ret;
> +
> + read_iov.iov_base = read_val;
> + write_iov.iov_base = write_val;
> +
> + /* Should be able to read a single TPIDR... */
> + read_iov.iov_len = sizeof(uint64_t);
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, NT_ARM_TLS, &read_iov);
> + ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "read_tpidr_one\n");
> +
> + /* ...write a new value.. */
> + write_iov.iov_len = sizeof(uint64_t);
> + write_val[0] = read_val[0]++;
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, child, NT_ARM_TLS, &write_iov);
> + ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "write_tpidr_one\n");
> +
> + /* ...then read it back */
> + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, NT_ARM_TLS, &read_iov);
> + ksft_test_result(ret == 0 && write_val[0] == read_val[0],
> + "verify_tpidr_one\n");
> +}
> +
> +static int do_child(void)
> +{
> + if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, -1, NULL, NULL))
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("PTRACE_TRACEME", strerror(errno));
> +
> + if (raise(SIGSTOP))
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("raise(SIGSTOP)", strerror(errno));
> +
> + return EXIT_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static int do_parent(pid_t child)
> +{
> + int ret = EXIT_FAILURE;
> + pid_t pid;
> + int status;
> + siginfo_t si;
> +
> + /* Attach to the child */
> + while (1) {
> + int sig;
> +
> + pid = wait(&status);
> + if (pid == -1) {
> + perror("wait");
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * This should never happen but it's hard to flag in
> + * the framework.
> + */
> + if (pid != child)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (WIFEXITED(status) || WIFSIGNALED(status))
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Child died unexpectedly\n");
> +
> + if (!WIFSTOPPED(status))
> + goto error;
> +
> + sig = WSTOPSIG(status);
> +
> + if (ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO, pid, NULL, &si)) {
> + if (errno == ESRCH)
> + goto disappeared;
> +
> + if (errno == EINVAL) {
> + sig = 0; /* bust group-stop */
> + goto cont;
> + }
> +
> + ksft_test_result_fail("PTRACE_GETSIGINFO: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + if (sig == SIGSTOP && si.si_code == SI_TKILL &&
> + si.si_pid == pid)
> + break;
> +
> + cont:
> + if (ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, NULL, sig)) {
> + if (errno == ESRCH)
> + goto disappeared;
> +
> + ksft_test_result_fail("PTRACE_CONT: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + goto error;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ksft_print_msg("Parent is %d, child is %d\n", getpid(), child);
> +
> + test_tpidr(child);
> +
> + ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
> +
> +error:
> + kill(child, SIGKILL);
> +
> +disappeared:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + int ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
> + pid_t child;
> +
> + srandom(getpid());
> +
> + ksft_print_header();
> +
> + ksft_set_plan(EXPECTED_TESTS);
> +
> + child = fork();
> + if (!child)
> + return do_child();
> +
> + if (do_parent(child))
> + ret = EXIT_FAILURE;
> +
> + ksft_print_cnts();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 13:30 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64/sme: ptrace support for TPIDR2_EL0 Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kselftest/arm64: Add test coverage for NT_ARM_TLS Mark Brown
2022-08-18 9:03 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2022-08-15 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64/ptrace: Document extension of NT_ARM_TLS to cover TPIDR2_EL0 Mark Brown
2022-08-18 9:17 ` Luis Machado
2022-08-18 12:52 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64/ptrace: Support access to TPIDR2_EL0 Mark Brown
2022-08-18 10:59 ` Luis Machado
2022-08-15 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kselftest/arm64: Add coverage of TPIDR2_EL0 ptrace interface Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08a76a19-5e9e-6943-802a-7ed26edf9240@arm.com \
--to=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=alan.hayward@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox