* [PATCH 0/3] selftests: coredump: Some bug fixes
@ 2025-03-31 16:50 Nam Cao
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer Nam Cao
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2025-03-31 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner
Cc: Shuah Khan, John Ogness, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Nam Cao
Hi,
While trying the coredump test on qemu-system-riscv64, I observed test
failures for various reasons.
This series makes the test works on qemu-system-riscv64.
Best regards,
Nam
Nam Cao (3):
selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer
selftests: coredump: Use waitpid() instead of busy-wait
selftests: coredump: Raise timeout to 2 minutes
tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump | 6 +-----
.../testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c | 17 +++++++++--------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer
2025-03-31 16:50 [PATCH 0/3] selftests: coredump: Some bug fixes Nam Cao
@ 2025-03-31 16:50 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-01 7:56 ` John Ogness
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests: coredump: Use waitpid() instead of busy-wait Nam Cao
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: coredump: Raise timeout to 2 minutes Nam Cao
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2025-03-31 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner
Cc: Shuah Khan, John Ogness, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Nam Cao
The buffer pointer "line" is not initialized. This pointer is passed to
getline().
It can still work if the stack is zero-initialized, because getline() can
work with a NULL pointer as buffer.
But this is obviously broken. This bug shows up while running the test on a
riscv64 machine.
Fix it by properly initializing the pointer.
Fixes: 15858da53542 ("selftests: coredump: Add stackdump test")
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
---
tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
index 137b2364a082..1dc54e128586 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
FILE *file;
pid_t pid;
+ line = NULL;
+
/*
* Step 1: Setup core_pattern so that the stackdump script is executed when the child
* process crashes
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] selftests: coredump: Use waitpid() instead of busy-wait
2025-03-31 16:50 [PATCH 0/3] selftests: coredump: Some bug fixes Nam Cao
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer Nam Cao
@ 2025-03-31 16:50 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-01 12:08 ` John Ogness
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: coredump: Raise timeout to 2 minutes Nam Cao
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2025-03-31 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner
Cc: Shuah Khan, John Ogness, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Nam Cao
The test waits for coredump to finish by busy-waiting for the
stackdump_values file to be created. The maximum wait time is 10 seconds.
This doesn't work for slow machine (qemu-system-riscv64), because coredump
takes longer.
Switch to use waitpid().
With this, the stack_values file doesn't need to be atomically written by
coredump anymore, therefore simplify the stackdump script.
Fixes: 15858da53542 ("selftests: coredump: Add stackdump test")
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
---
tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump | 6 +-----
tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c | 13 ++++++-------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump
index 96714ce42d12..ad487fd5ff15 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump
@@ -4,11 +4,7 @@
CRASH_PROGRAM_ID=$1
STACKDUMP_FILE=$2
-TMP=$(mktemp)
-
for t in /proc/$CRASH_PROGRAM_ID/task/*; do
tid=$(basename $t)
- cat /proc/$tid/stat | awk '{print $29}' >> $TMP
+ cat /proc/$tid/stat | awk '{print $29}' >> $STACKDUMP_FILE
done
-
-mv $TMP $STACKDUMP_FILE
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
index 1dc54e128586..733feaa0f895 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
char *test_dir, *line;
size_t line_length;
char buf[PATH_MAX];
- int ret, i;
+ int ret, i, status;
FILE *file;
pid_t pid;
@@ -131,12 +131,11 @@ TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
/*
* Step 3: Wait for the stackdump script to write the stack pointers to the stackdump file
*/
- for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
- file = fopen(STACKDUMP_FILE, "r");
- if (file)
- break;
- sleep(1);
- }
+ waitpid(pid, &status, 0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(WIFSIGNALED(status));
+ ASSERT_TRUE(WCOREDUMP(status));
+
+ file = fopen(STACKDUMP_FILE, "r");
ASSERT_NE(file, NULL);
/* Step 4: Make sure all stack pointer values are non-zero */
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] selftests: coredump: Raise timeout to 2 minutes
2025-03-31 16:50 [PATCH 0/3] selftests: coredump: Some bug fixes Nam Cao
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer Nam Cao
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests: coredump: Use waitpid() instead of busy-wait Nam Cao
@ 2025-03-31 16:50 ` Nam Cao
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2025-03-31 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner
Cc: Shuah Khan, John Ogness, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Nam Cao
The test's runtime (nearly 20s) is dangerously close to the limit (30s) on
qemu-system-riscv64:
$ time ./stackdump_test > /dev/null
real 0m19.210s
user 0m0.077s
sys 0m0.359s
There could be machines slower than qemu-system-riscv64. Therefore raise
the test timeout to 2 minutes to be safe.
Fixes: 15858da53542 ("selftests: coredump: Add stackdump test")
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
---
tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
index 733feaa0f895..b1924acf02af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(coredump)
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to cleanup stackdump test: %s\n", reason);
}
-TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
+TEST_F_TIMEOUT(coredump, stackdump, 120)
{
struct sigaction action = {};
unsigned long long stack;
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer Nam Cao
@ 2025-04-01 7:56 ` John Ogness
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Ogness @ 2025-04-01 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nam Cao, Christian Brauner
Cc: Shuah Khan, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Nam Cao
On 2025-03-31, Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The buffer pointer "line" is not initialized. This pointer is passed to
> getline().
Ouch.
> It can still work if the stack is zero-initialized, because getline() can
> work with a NULL pointer as buffer.
>
> But this is obviously broken. This bug shows up while running the test on a
> riscv64 machine.
>
> Fix it by properly initializing the pointer.
>
> Fixes: 15858da53542 ("selftests: coredump: Add stackdump test")
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
> index 137b2364a082..1dc54e128586 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
> FILE *file;
> pid_t pid;
>
> + line = NULL;
The syntax of getline(3) is quite interesting, since it
allocates/reallocates/uses the lineptr as needed and possibly requires
the application to free the data. I recommend moving the initialization
down to the getline() call and also add the corresponding free().
Something like this:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
index 137b2364a082..c23cf95c3f6d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
@@ -138,10 +138,12 @@ TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
ASSERT_NE(file, NULL);
/* Step 4: Make sure all stack pointer values are non-zero */
+ line = NULL;
for (i = 0; -1 != getline(&line, &line_length, file); ++i) {
stack = strtoull(line, NULL, 10);
ASSERT_NE(stack, 0);
}
+ free(line);
ASSERT_EQ(i, 1 + NUM_THREAD_SPAWN);
Because of how getline() works, technically your patch is good
enough. But we should probably excercise more precision in the use of
getline() so as to set a good example.
John Ogness
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests: coredump: Use waitpid() instead of busy-wait
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests: coredump: Use waitpid() instead of busy-wait Nam Cao
@ 2025-04-01 12:08 ` John Ogness
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Ogness @ 2025-04-01 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nam Cao, Christian Brauner
Cc: Shuah Khan, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, Nam Cao
On 2025-03-31, Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The test waits for coredump to finish by busy-waiting for the
> stackdump_values file to be created. The maximum wait time is 10 seconds.
>
> This doesn't work for slow machine (qemu-system-riscv64), because coredump
> takes longer.
>
> Switch to use waitpid().
Note that you are now assuming that returning from waitpid() means that:
1. the coredumping has completed
and
2. the STACKDUMP_FILE with all its contents are visible to the parent
process
> With this, the stack_values file doesn't need to be atomically written by
> coredump anymore, therefore simplify the stackdump script.
>
> Fixes: 15858da53542 ("selftests: coredump: Add stackdump test")
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump | 6 +-----
> tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump
> index 96714ce42d12..ad487fd5ff15 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump
> @@ -4,11 +4,7 @@
> CRASH_PROGRAM_ID=$1
> STACKDUMP_FILE=$2
>
> -TMP=$(mktemp)
> -
> for t in /proc/$CRASH_PROGRAM_ID/task/*; do
> tid=$(basename $t)
> - cat /proc/$tid/stat | awk '{print $29}' >> $TMP
> + cat /proc/$tid/stat | awk '{print $29}' >> $STACKDUMP_FILE
> done
> -
> -mv $TMP $STACKDUMP_FILE
I would leave this as it was. Then the availability of STACKDUMP_FILE
means the full contents are available.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
> index 1dc54e128586..733feaa0f895 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/coredump/stackdump_test.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
> char *test_dir, *line;
> size_t line_length;
> char buf[PATH_MAX];
> - int ret, i;
> + int ret, i, status;
> FILE *file;
> pid_t pid;
>
> @@ -131,12 +131,11 @@ TEST_F(coredump, stackdump)
> /*
> * Step 3: Wait for the stackdump script to write the stack pointers to the stackdump file
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
> - file = fopen(STACKDUMP_FILE, "r");
> - if (file)
> - break;
> - sleep(1);
> - }
> + waitpid(pid, &status, 0);
> + ASSERT_TRUE(WIFSIGNALED(status));
> + ASSERT_TRUE(WCOREDUMP(status));
Why not just put these 3 lines above the for-loop? So you would wait for
the process to end, then go into the 20-second timeout loop waiting for
STACKDUMP_FILE to show up.
John Ogness
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-01 12:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-31 16:50 [PATCH 0/3] selftests: coredump: Some bug fixes Nam Cao
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: coredump: Properly initialize pointer Nam Cao
2025-04-01 7:56 ` John Ogness
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests: coredump: Use waitpid() instead of busy-wait Nam Cao
2025-04-01 12:08 ` John Ogness
2025-03-31 16:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: coredump: Raise timeout to 2 minutes Nam Cao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).