From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests/resctrl: Fix set up shemata with 100% allocation on first run in MBM test.
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 13:56:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10ca9b73-b3e1-4139-6cbf-c362467c7943@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221005013933.1486054-2-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi Shaopeng,
I understand there is a typo in the code you are modifying but I do not think
that justifies the same typo in the subject: shemata -> schemata
On 10/4/2022 6:39 PM, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> There is a comment "Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run"
> in function mbm_setup(), but there is an increment bug and the condition
> "num_of_runs == 0" will never be met and write_schemata() will never be
> called to set schemata to 100%. This is currently fine because
> resctl_val_parm->num_resctrlfs is always 1 and umount/mount will be run
resctl_val_parm -> resctrl_val_param
num_resctrlfs -> mum_resctrlfs
> in each test to set the schemata to 100%.
>
> To make mbm_setup() future code-change proof, fix to call
You could be more specific by indicating that this change will
support the usage when the test does not unmount/remount resctrl before
the test.
> write-schemata() properly when the function is called for the first time.
write-schemata() -> write_schemata()
>
> Also, remove static local variable 'num_of_runs' because this is not
> needed as there is resctl_val_param->num_of_runs which should be used
resctl_val_param -> resctrl_val_param
> instead like in cat_setup().
With the move to using a member from the struct I think it would make the
code easier to understand if num_of_runs is explicitly initialized. That is
indeed the norm when looking at the other call sites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> index 8392e5c55ed0..4a54be314402 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> @@ -89,12 +89,11 @@ static int check_results(int span)
> static int mbm_setup(int num, ...)
> {
> struct resctrl_val_param *p;
p is defined here ...
> - static int num_of_runs;
> va_list param;
> int ret = 0;
>
> /* Run NUM_OF_RUNS times */
> - if (num_of_runs++ >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
> + if (p->num_of_runs >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
p is used here _before_ it is initialized in the code that follows.
> return -1;
>
> va_start(param, num);
> @@ -102,9 +101,10 @@ static int mbm_setup(int num, ...)
> va_end(param);
>
> /* Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run. */
> - if (num_of_runs == 0)
> + if (p->num_of_runs == 0)
> ret = write_schemata(p->ctrlgrp, "100", p->cpu_no,
> p->resctrl_val);
> + p->num_of_runs++;
>
> return ret;
> }
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-05 1:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] Some improvements of resctrl selftest Shaopeng Tan
2022-10-05 1:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests/resctrl: Fix set up shemata with 100% allocation on first run in MBM test Shaopeng Tan
2022-10-05 20:56 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-10-05 1:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] selftests/resctrl: Return MBA check result and make it to output message Shaopeng Tan
2022-10-05 1:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file Shaopeng Tan
2022-10-05 20:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-05 1:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/resctrl: Flush stdout file buffer before executing fork() Shaopeng Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10ca9b73-b3e1-4139-6cbf-c362467c7943@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox