From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Adrien Thierry <athierry@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/net: give more time to udpgro bg processes to complete startup
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 10:20:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166755721662.22576.1172812278551216334.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101184809.50013-1-athierry@redhat.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:48:08 -0400 you wrote:
> In some conditions, background processes in udpgro don't have enough
> time to set up the sockets. When foreground processes start, this
> results in the test failing with "./udpgso_bench_tx: sendmsg: Connection
> refused". For instance, this happens from time to time on a Qualcomm
> SA8540P SoC running CentOS Stream 9.
>
> To fix this, increase the time given to background processes to
> complete the startup before foreground processes start.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- selftests/net: give more time to udpgro bg processes to complete startup
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cdb525ca92b1
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-04 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 18:48 [PATCH] selftests/net: give more time to udpgro bg processes to complete startup Adrien Thierry
2022-11-04 3:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 8:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-11-04 17:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 10:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=166755721662.22576.1172812278551216334.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=athierry@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox