From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, borisp@nvidia.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
vakul.garg@nxp.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] tls: fixes for record type handling with PEEK
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:30:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170855462906.28356.14505768197240352814.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1708007371.git.sd@queasysnail.net>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:17:28 +0100 you wrote:
> There are multiple bugs in tls_sw_recvmsg's handling of record types
> when MSG_PEEK flag is used, which can lead to incorrectly merging two
> records:
> - consecutive non-DATA records shouldn't be merged, even if they're
> the same type (partly handled by the test at the end of the main
> loop)
> - records of the same type (even DATA) shouldn't be merged if one
> record of a different type comes in between
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,1/5] tls: break out of main loop when PEEK gets a non-data record
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/10f41d0710fc
- [net,2/5] tls: stop recv() if initial process_rx_list gave us non-DATA
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/fdfbaec5923d
- [net,3/5] tls: don't skip over different type records from the rx_list
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/ec823bf3a479
- [net,4/5] selftests: tls: add test for merging of same-type control messages
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/7b2a4c2a623a
- [net,5/5] selftests: tls: add test for peeking past a record of a different type
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/2bf6172632e1
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-15 16:17 [PATCH net 0/5] tls: fixes for record type handling with PEEK Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-15 16:17 ` [PATCH net 1/5] tls: break out of main loop when PEEK gets a non-data record Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-15 16:17 ` [PATCH net 2/5] tls: stop recv() if initial process_rx_list gave us non-DATA Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-15 16:17 ` [PATCH net 3/5] tls: don't skip over different type records from the rx_list Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-19 20:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-19 23:10 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-21 1:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 13:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-21 18:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-21 18:42 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-15 16:17 ` [PATCH net 4/5] selftests: tls: add test for merging of same-type control messages Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-15 16:17 ` [PATCH net 5/5] selftests: tls: add test for peeking past a record of a different type Sabrina Dubroca
2024-02-21 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170855462906.28356.14505768197240352814.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vakul.garg@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox