From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25041C5799; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732641016; cv=none; b=PbjQqOlzcNqJJ3moavrBTsSK4nqgEty4R7m7ubMWEQcUfs1skboeZpvll8Ono0dWRXq6bKhcpm4thDqBK6hF1jRIqoZXCF3+u3dtc3kIhSQkmwWUoFRh0wFQkmccbQ0SoslIS7d+IA7QVFkHNNvvGm45xG+PDuFedbPgnrmu33o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732641016; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MvAd4gRVH2AxB1g6QxikjUit0eu8/aIb2WGd+Mdae74=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=c8v4QzKwF2gSmLvcs4ALZEizDC/SJdpP1+1anCi5mOf5mYih6QmWIfdfGQXJBRu52SpmwpduZnRJcnv6lLTWxwYD+8CU7YDs8Bfxgm6E8c+uv2w4N4MuTLikCP784eph+syth+EfOnXDDkNk8a+aacWOGi0eVDCB9FGRItGSDu8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IOuYoEUq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IOuYoEUq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EF6DC4CECF; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:10:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1732641016; bh=MvAd4gRVH2AxB1g6QxikjUit0eu8/aIb2WGd+Mdae74=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=IOuYoEUqYJjAP7ZJVrwFf5jBW5DYR1vWxHLzauRCQn6LgOnXmZ4NBAsb2Xty04F5A TKBSle+n3cS65v4vacsPD9aNB19dks9fPHe6HrUEbBowDlxJGzVR7R+4Wm+NLCPbWU KkdQifFl8sLbjoMzEb0J510XZXepc8bbAQ42XR3fVF+z1sDff5dkL81c88peMaXz+k KfyFqzMuGtOeYbkKanO1lt5+oM2j0+1sbYooj7CYbR8uIhjIn9KpQTlbqHsWyrLUfC lMKAmxz/reuBoDCAczLg9MIomedRpj62X2CgXw97nRI2r9GQmy7DG/buPgT2idzbUi obmR3isVTHfMg== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1B03809A00; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: Check for PREEMPTION instead of PREEMPT From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <173264102952.477780.5683459007751613946.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:10:29 +0000 References: <20241119161819.qvEcs-n_@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20241119161819.qvEcs-n_@linutronix.de> To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com, shuah@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:18:19 +0100 you wrote: > CONFIG_PREEMPT is a preemtion model the so called "Low-Latency Desktop". > A different preemption model is PREEMPT_RT the so called "Real-Time". > Both implement preemption in kernel and set CONFIG_PREEMPTION. > There is also the so called "LAZY PREEMPT" which the "Scheduler > controlled preemption model". Here we have also preemption in the kernel > the rules are slightly different. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf] selftests/bpf: Check for PREEMPTION instead of PREEMPT https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/6b64128a74eb You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html