From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8491D5ABA; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 01:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771982401; cv=none; b=GxYtv+YpyWBaST9t6/2/sJ1UfIRCX3ZClu7F7hpATR3xaiQJIEHk8mVKePRN0U0WLN0zzVr0LTGlLhxHGKg42AE6G+lkuvzpSwKuL/Th/DXwm+wk/gU7uYXkvIs84KjUsfjpjxjAshydkN+3dXOaucDy5SXNxcWPhoA9U3p0hZQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771982401; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JG8QoKBVRtK9A3HZdQullOOHjhjO+hCedrg/ou/hOm4=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=gCU2cB9BTjr/u66pi8B/HHSHd9IuJoKB0DVIvKlWgDzptWQpL2K4i+iix7KupyT77vJmZJoubqF0EYyAxQLWjNgmVxHfjyx9ZpXgZ+ePgCzSJTFHAnqrhqsEywd6tNIegu3HoJEjCKQQFtpn3312f+KAvVK5eCBkiBJ2JucvW8o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PsbagQE3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PsbagQE3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1049C116D0; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 01:20:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771982401; bh=JG8QoKBVRtK9A3HZdQullOOHjhjO+hCedrg/ou/hOm4=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=PsbagQE3CmTZr6U4Sr5Gnt5MY+0EdljiKUN19GSvcIgWEoaSDaxqQoJ3PF6AF9z74 xF5ZiNHfFJLlVSCi3UL7cicTNpwS6I1hqmq1c/qIAKrPNYA/FMJFPAxcKeADzeC6aB oRMBohYLOlzAWSa5oFZm2yG9HMStgw+jdEzZB0KNXL9byfNaXcc87Z2B117ElEG8Iq ufx1K0Xb1B3FXSaPkl01e/cf0i/r3YzyawYammsovkEu6ZdZI2vw5KzzVbANpwlkgb SOr5a3pAQuR5G6F+4JChjFewbA7zv39dll86T3/fnHN2KJQgbLd78tlxLU6ulpVZUC av2FJmBS7kW1Q== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFEF3808203; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 01:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: test accounting of tail calls when prog is NULL From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <177198240631.23068.16768536304424176943.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 01:20:06 +0000 References: <20260216090802.1805655-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20260216090802.1805655-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> To: Hari Bathini Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov : On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:38:02 +0530 you wrote: > Test whether tail call count is incorrectly accounted for, when the > tail call fails due to a missing BPF program. > > Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini > --- > > - powerpc64 BPF JIT has been incorrectly accounting for tailcall count > even when BPF program to tailcall into is missing. A simple change > to one of the tailcall selftests could have flagged it earlier. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - selftests/bpf: test accounting of tail calls when prog is NULL https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8ebfe65e22d5 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html