From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, jiayuan.chen@shopee.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev, jakub@cloudflare.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1] selftests/bpf: Fix sockmap_multi_channels reliability
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 20:40:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177438481505.1297770.2936665516613350095.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260312072549.6766-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:25:44 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
>
> Previously I added a FIONREAD test for sockmap, but it can occasionally
> fail in CI [1].
>
> The test sends 10 bytes in two segments (2 + 8). For UDP, FIONREAD only
> reports the length of the first datagram, not the total queued data.
> The original code used recv_timeout() expecting all 10 bytes, but under
> high system load, the second datagram may not yet be processed by the
> protocol stack, so recv would only return the first 2-byte datagram,
> causing a size mismatch failure.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf,v1] selftests/bpf: Fix sockmap_multi_channels reliability
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d9d7125e445d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 7:25 [PATCH bpf v1] selftests/bpf: Fix sockmap_multi_channels reliability Jiayuan Chen
2026-03-24 20:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177438481505.1297770.2936665516613350095.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@shopee.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox