From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, matttbe@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] tools: ynl: Allow cross-compiling ynl and associated tools
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 16:17:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178888423937.219967.10276622634271984772@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907161438.755125-2-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 2 · Low: 0
- [Medium] tools/net/ynl/ynltool/Makefile now inherits the tools/ `O=` ->
`OUTPUT` contract from tools/scripts/Makefile.include but only half-…
- [Medium] Removing the `CC=gcc` pin while letting Makefile.include
select clang makes the GCC-only `-static-libasan` flag reach clang,…
--
tools: ynl: Allow cross-compiling ynl and associated tools
The four ynl Makefiles now include tools/scripts/Makefile.include so that
CC and AR honour CROSS_COMPILE and LLVM, the ynltool CFLAGS assignment is
switched from := to += and the local Q definition is dropped in favour of
the one from Makefile.include.
No Link: tags in the commit header.
Two questions below, one about O= handling in ynltool and one about
-static-libasan now that CC is no longer pinned to gcc.
> diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/Makefile b/tools/net/ynl/Makefile
> index 3cefe4ed96cb9..838c465d65aa8 100644
> --- a/tools/net/ynl/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/net/ynl/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> +include ../../scripts/Makefile.include
> include ../../scripts/Makefile.arch
>
> INSTALL ?= install
> diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/generated/Makefile b/tools/net/ynl/generated/Makefile
> index ea4128f612d6c..5a186349b5a86 100644
> --- a/tools/net/ynl/generated/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/net/ynl/generated/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -CC=gcc
> +include ../../../scripts/Makefile.include
> +
> CFLAGS += -std=gnu11 -O2 -W -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wshadow \
> -I../lib/ -idirafter $(UAPI_PATH)
> ifeq ("$(DEBUG)","1")
> diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/lib/Makefile b/tools/net/ynl/lib/Makefile
> index 9b98c05996000..7b3eae89982f8 100644
> --- a/tools/net/ynl/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/net/ynl/lib/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -CC=gcc
> +include ../../../scripts/Makefile.include
> +
> CFLAGS += -std=gnu11 -O2 -W -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wshadow
> ifeq ("$(DEBUG)","1")
> CFLAGS += -g -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=leak -static-libasan
> diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/tests/Makefile b/tools/net/ynl/tests/Makefile
> index 40827ca8e579d..99ae7dcd63484 100644
> --- a/tools/net/ynl/tests/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/net/ynl/tests/Makefile
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
> # Makefile for YNL tests
>
> include ../Makefile.deps
> +include ../../../scripts/Makefile.include
>
> -CC=gcc
[Severity: Medium]
With the CC=gcc pin removed here, does a "make LLVM=1 -C tools/net/ynl"
build still complete? Makefile.include picks clang for LLVM builds:
ifneq ($(LLVM),)
...
$(call allow-override,CC,$(LLVM_PREFIX)clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX))
and tests/Makefile turns the sanitizer flags on unless NDEBUG=1:
ifneq ("$(NDEBUG)","1")
CFLAGS += -g -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=leak -static-libasan
endif
clang's driver does not accept -static-libasan. Other selftests Makefiles
guard exactly this flag, for example
tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/openat2/Makefile:
# gcc requires -static-libasan in order to ensure that Address Sanitizer's
# library is the first one loaded. However, clang already statically links the
# Address Sanitizer if -fsanitize is specified. Therefore, simply omit
# -static-libasan for clang builds.
ifeq ($(LLVM),)
CFLAGS += -static-libasan
endif
tests is listed in SUBDIRS of tools/net/ynl/Makefile and the default goal
is "all: $(SUBDIRS) libynl.a", so this is hit by a plain build with LLVM=1
(with or without CROSS_COMPILE, which is the configuration named in the
commit message).
The same unguarded flag sits on the DEBUG=1 paths of lib/Makefile,
generated/Makefile and ynltool/Makefile. Should all four get the
ifeq ($(LLVM),) guard as part of this change?
> CFLAGS += -std=gnu11 -O2 -W -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wshadow \
> -I../lib/ -I../generated/ -I../../../testing/selftests/ \
> -idirafter $(UAPI_PATH)
> diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/ynltool/Makefile b/tools/net/ynl/ynltool/Makefile
> index 48b0f32050f0e..b8c67cdb4fdf0 100644
> --- a/tools/net/ynl/ynltool/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/net/ynl/ynltool/Makefile
> @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>
> include ../Makefile.deps
> +include ../../../scripts/Makefile.include
[Severity: Medium]
Does pulling Makefile.include in here break "make O=<dir>" for ynltool?
Makefile.include translates a command line O= into OUTPUT:
ifneq ($(O),)
ifeq ($(origin O), command line)
$(if $(shell cd $(PWD); test -d $(O) || echo $(O)),$(error O=$(O) does not exist),)
ABSOLUTE_O := $(shell cd $(PWD); cd $(O) ; pwd)
OUTPUT := $(ABSOLUTE_O)/$(if $(subdir),$(subdir)/)
ynltool/Makefile already names its targets with that prefix:
OBJS := $(patsubst %.c,$(OUTPUT)%.o,$(SRCS))
YNLTOOL := $(OUTPUT)ynltool
but the only object rule carries no $(OUTPUT) and does not create the
directory:
%.o: %.c ../libynl.a
$(Q)echo -e "\tCC $@"
$(Q)$(COMPILE.c) -MMD -c -o $@ $<
For a target such as /tmp/out/ynl.o and a target pattern containing no
slash, make strips the directory, matches the stem, and re-prepends the
directory to the derived prerequisite, so it looks for /tmp/out/ynl.c.
There is no vpath and nothing creates /tmp/out, so does
"make -C tools/net/ynl/ynltool O=/tmp/out" stop with "No rule to make
target '/tmp/out/<name>.o', needed by '/tmp/out/ynltool'"?
Command line variables propagate through MAKEFLAGS, and the top level
recipe runs the sub-makes with
$(SUBDIRS):
@if [ -f "$@/Makefile" ] ; then \
$(MAKE) -C $@ ; \
fi
so "make -C tools/net/ynl O=/tmp/out" reaches the same path through the
default goal. Other tools/ Makefiles that honour this interface spell the
rule as $(OUTPUT)%.o: %.c - would that plus an mkdir be the fix here?
The install rule interpolates the prefixed name too:
install: $(YNLTOOL)
$(INSTALL) -m 0755 $(YNLTOOL) $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(YNLTOOL)
With OUTPUT set, does the destination become
$(DESTDIR)/usr/bin//tmp/out/ynltool rather than $(DESTDIR)/usr/bin/ynltool?
Related: lib/Makefile, generated/Makefile and tests/Makefile now include
Makefile.include but ignore OUTPUT entirely, so an O= build would keep
writing their objects into the source tree while only ynltool tries to
honour it. Was leaving the four sub-makefiles inconsistent about O=
intentional, or should O= be rejected until they all handle it?
>
> INSTALL ?= install
> prefix ?= /usr
>
> -CC := gcc
> -CFLAGS := -Wall -Wextra -Werror -O2
> +CFLAGS += -Wall -Wextra -Werror -O2
> ifeq ("$(DEBUG)","1")
> CFLAGS += -g -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=leak -static-libasan
> endif
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260907161438.755125-1-maxime.chevallier%40bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:14 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] selftests: drv-net: Allow cross-compiling the hardware tests Maxime Chevallier (Netdev Foundation)
2026-09-07 16:14 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] tools: ynl: Allow cross-compiling ynl and associated tools Maxime Chevallier (Netdev Foundation)
2026-09-08 16:17 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-09 1:11 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-09-07 16:14 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] selftests: drv-net: Use cross-compilation environment for the io_uring check Maxime Chevallier (Netdev Foundation)
2026-09-08 16:17 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 0:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] selftests: drv-net: Allow cross-compiling the hardware tests patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-09-09 0:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178888423937.219967.10276622634271984772@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox