From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [159.69.126.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BAB02BFC85; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777461287; cv=none; b=khOg+oFitCDA2Xz1NWzwrFTeeSQnVEemVuV5vfdB+1DRrPPogiljbWgKvN1MIO7kzWCwVupNgtFWNZVkMAomkovr+P2xkmkG6LJp4LYCJzVKl2Tbi853s3SXextiaJgPtsiBhQhO/EkdmYOYD9YUv/ixfCypYtpxR3oi1xtBXZs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777461287; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ON3ZXNp2mNn0teuGO1Qch5RiWn/snTfcpl/leGkxYho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EdiucZTIhcASizJi9HKfT2fgYqga2ZearvUNKMY2lCaRmcflNgWVQQE18GzrV5jONjsS1K8LrzxtcG0QQD1Ih2uExSsaMKiaUgk0Fk8SHzlJZwMgejFzNX/CxChUJ3yUnaxPx58Vbr8FAo2ydd/6S4KEPVD05qwSbad0aIcgiBw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b=nUIBLiwh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b="nUIBLiwh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=weissschuh.net; s=mail; t=1777461284; bh=ON3ZXNp2mNn0teuGO1Qch5RiWn/snTfcpl/leGkxYho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nUIBLiwhS6K0U2ji2ZtCW8eb1K2wMFJlY3SD7I5H5EGw4KPX0AQoBXWopwJu8LbGX tAo8L3j/r5oy7oVLVN7IfKLFC9S6xwdvCU1t1nvLiLuiXdLPhjGX/uqorTIBv94PyH W3lS2bGH6mEWcFr2Lx3I71qjsh4T2o05mj9lTFAY= Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:14:42 +0200 From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= To: David Gow Cc: Nathan Chancellor , Nicolas Schier , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Brendan Higgins , David Gow , Rae Moar , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kunit: qemu_configs: Add or1k / openrisc configuration Message-ID: <19c00a88-ea92-4f17-afb6-9fa5da247d21@t-8ch.de> References: <20260427-kunit-or1k-v1-0-9d3109e991e8@weissschuh.net> <20260427-kunit-or1k-v1-2-9d3109e991e8@weissschuh.net> <279a16dd-f98f-44ef-9685-44537eac2892@ingeniumdigital.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <279a16dd-f98f-44ef-9685-44537eac2892@ingeniumdigital.com> On 2026-04-29 18:10:58+0800, David Gow wrote: > Le 28/04/2026 à 12:04 AM, 'Thomas Weißschuh' via KUnit Development a écrit : > > Add a basic configuration to run kunit tests on or1k / openrisc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh > > --- > > Thanks very much. This works well here (assuming CONFIG_KUNIT_FAULT_TESTS=n, > and either a long timeout, or slow tests skipped, as qemu-or1k is not fast > on my machine). > > Reviewed-by: David Gow Thanks! > Do we want to split the series and take this patch via kselftest/kunit, and > the generate_compile_commands one separately, or just pick both up in the > same tree? They should go through the same tree as otherwise kunit.py will fail to build the or1k architecture, as it always tries to generate compile_commands.json. (...)