From: rostedt at goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt)
Subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:06:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711090649.68af40f9@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180711125647.GG2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:56:47 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:21:46AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
> > {
> > + synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu);
> > synchronize_sched();
> > }
>
> Given you below do call_rcu_sched() and then call_srcu(), isn't the
> above the wrong way around?
Good catch!
release_probes()
call_rcu_sched()
---> rcu_free_old_probes() queued
tracepoint_synchronize_unregister()
synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu);
< finishes right away >
synchronize_sched()
--> rcu_free_old_probes()
--> srcu_free_old_probes() queued
Here tracepoint_synchronize_unregister() returned before the srcu
portion ran.
>
> Also, does the above want to be barrier instead of synchronize, so as to
> guarantee completion of the callbacks.
Not sure what you mean here.
-- Steve
>
> > +static void srcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head)
> > {
> > kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu));
> > }
> >
> > +static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head)
> > +{
> > + call_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu, head, srcu_free_old_probes);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old)
> > {
> > if (old) {
> > struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old,
> > struct tp_probes, probes[0]);
> > + /*
> > + * Tracepoint probes are protected by both sched RCU and SRCU,
> > + * by calling the SRCU callback in the sched RCU callback we
> > + * cover both cases. So let us chain the SRCU and sched RCU
> > + * callbacks to wait for both grace periods.
> > + */
> > call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> > }
> > }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rostedt@goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt)
Subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:06:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711090649.68af40f9@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180711130649.zX6sIBwwAA-0Tt_cLpKppbpmeVIuzRZMq7pOQfXLJ_I@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180711125647.GG2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:56:47 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018@11:21:46AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
> > {
> > + synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu);
> > synchronize_sched();
> > }
>
> Given you below do call_rcu_sched() and then call_srcu(), isn't the
> above the wrong way around?
Good catch!
release_probes()
call_rcu_sched()
---> rcu_free_old_probes() queued
tracepoint_synchronize_unregister()
synchronize_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu);
< finishes right away >
synchronize_sched()
--> rcu_free_old_probes()
--> srcu_free_old_probes() queued
Here tracepoint_synchronize_unregister() returned before the srcu
portion ran.
>
> Also, does the above want to be barrier instead of synchronize, so as to
> guarantee completion of the callbacks.
Not sure what you mean here.
-- Steve
>
> > +static void srcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head)
> > {
> > kfree(container_of(head, struct tp_probes, rcu));
> > }
> >
> > +static void rcu_free_old_probes(struct rcu_head *head)
> > +{
> > + call_srcu(&tracepoint_srcu, head, srcu_free_old_probes);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void release_probes(struct tracepoint_func *old)
> > {
> > if (old) {
> > struct tp_probes *tp_probes = container_of(old,
> > struct tp_probes, probes[0]);
> > + /*
> > + * Tracepoint probes are protected by both sched RCU and SRCU,
> > + * by calling the SRCU callback in the sched RCU callback we
> > + * cover both cases. So let us chain the SRCU and sched RCU
> > + * callbacks to wait for both grace periods.
> > + */
> > call_rcu_sched(&tp_probes->rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> > }
> > }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-11 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 18:21 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] srcu: Add notrace variants of srcu_read_{lock,unlock} joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] srcu: Add notrace variant of srcu_dereference joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] trace/irqsoff: Split reset into separate functions joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 12:49 ` peterz
2018-07-11 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:00 ` rostedt
2018-07-11 13:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 14:27 ` paulmck
2018-07-11 14:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 14:46 ` rostedt
2018-07-11 14:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:15 ` paulmck
2018-07-11 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 20:56 ` joel
2018-07-11 20:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 1:22 ` rostedt
2018-07-12 1:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 2:35 ` joel
2018-07-12 2:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:52 ` joel
2018-07-11 20:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 3:21 ` rostedt
2018-07-12 3:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 4:28 ` joel
2018-07-12 4:28 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 13:35 ` rostedt
2018-07-12 13:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 19:17 ` joel
2018-07-12 19:17 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 20:15 ` rostedt
2018-07-12 20:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:29 ` joel
2018-07-12 20:29 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 20:31 ` rostedt
2018-07-12 20:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 12:53 ` peterz
2018-07-11 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-12 2:32 ` joel
2018-07-12 2:32 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 12:56 ` peterz
2018-07-11 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:06 ` rostedt [this message]
2018-07-11 13:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:17 ` peterz
2018-07-11 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 15:26 ` rostedt
2018-07-11 15:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 16:46 ` mathieu.desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40 ` mathieu.desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-12 0:31 ` joel
2018-07-12 0:31 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 1:26 ` rostedt
2018-07-12 1:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-06 22:06 ` rostedt
2018-07-06 22:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-07 4:20 ` joel
2018-07-07 4:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-10 14:20 ` rostedt
2018-07-10 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 17:33 ` joel
2018-07-10 17:33 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 13:12 ` peterz
2018-07-11 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:19 ` rostedt
2018-07-11 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22 ` rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 8:38 ` joel
2018-07-12 8:38 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 13:37 ` rostedt
2018-07-12 13:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 0:44 ` joel
2018-07-12 0:44 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 0:47 ` rostedt
2018-07-11 0:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 5:26 ` joel
2018-07-11 5:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 0:49 ` rostedt
2018-07-11 0:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 5:27 ` joel
2018-07-11 5:27 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:15 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints joel
2018-07-03 14:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:23 ` rostedt
2018-07-03 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-21 22:32 joel
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU joel
2018-06-21 22:32 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq joelaf
2018-06-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU joelaf
2018-06-07 20:38 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180711090649.68af40f9@gandalf.local.home \
--to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).