From: bauerman at linux.ibm.com (Thiago Jung Bauermann)
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if userfaultfd() syscall not supported
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:00:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180803220046.4019-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180803220046.4019-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Since there's no point in doing anything in this case, immediately exit the
process.
And take the opportunity to improve the error message.
Before:
# ./userfaultfd shmem 10 10
nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 40
userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel
# echo $?
1
After:
# ./userfaultfd shmem 10 10
nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 40
userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel: Function not implemented
# echo $?
4
Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index e4099afe7557..d728bd1cb33c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -636,9 +636,11 @@ static int userfaultfd_open(int features)
uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK);
if (uffd < 0) {
- fprintf(stderr,
- "userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel\n");
- return 1;
+ int errnum = errno;
+
+ perror("userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel");
+
+ exit(errnum == ENOSYS ? KSFT_SKIP : 1);
}
uffd_flags = fcntl(uffd, F_GETFD, NULL);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bauerman@linux.ibm.com (Thiago Jung Bauermann)
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if userfaultfd() syscall not supported
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:00:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180803220046.4019-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180803220044.slrZtpUqQPX4w4JEwh9HJVnC-dQxqscY0k8UIq3xusE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180803220046.4019-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Since there's no point in doing anything in this case, immediately exit the
process.
And take the opportunity to improve the error message.
Before:
# ./userfaultfd shmem 10 10
nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 40
userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel
# echo $?
1
After:
# ./userfaultfd shmem 10 10
nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 40
userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel: Function not implemented
# echo $?
4
Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index e4099afe7557..d728bd1cb33c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -636,9 +636,11 @@ static int userfaultfd_open(int features)
uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK);
if (uffd < 0) {
- fprintf(stderr,
- "userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel\n");
- return 1;
+ int errnum = errno;
+
+ perror("userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel");
+
+ exit(errnum == ENOSYS ? KSFT_SKIP : 1);
}
uffd_flags = fcntl(uffd, F_GETFD, NULL);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-03 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 22:00 [PATCH v2 0/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Improve behavior with older kernels bauerman
2018-08-03 22:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Fix checking of userfaultfd_open() result bauerman
2018-08-03 22:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07 6:50 ` rppt
2018-08-07 6:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-03 22:00 ` bauerman [this message]
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if userfaultfd() syscall not supported Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07 6:50 ` rppt
2018-08-07 6:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported bauerman
2018-08-03 22:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07 6:51 ` rppt
2018-08-07 6:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-03 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Cope if shmem doesn't support zeropage bauerman
2018-08-03 22:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-07 6:56 ` rppt
2018-08-07 6:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-08-28 2:46 ` bauerman
2018-08-28 2:46 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 6:15 ` rppt
2018-08-28 6:15 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180803220046.4019-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).