From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gorcunov at gmail.com (Cyrill Gorcunov)
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 20:21:40 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
In-Reply-To: <52504bd5-b4ed-518b-f748-c634172c6c68@linaro.org>
References: <20181011184359.15627-1-rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
 <20181011205601.GA32757@avx2> <20181011210256.GE2401@uranus.lan>
 <20181011213006.GA13485@avx2> <20181011220009.GF2401@uranus.lan>
 <52504bd5-b4ed-518b-f748-c634172c6c68@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20181015172140.GJ2401@uranus.lan>

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 01:55:14PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> That is what I also had in mind, thus the patch. I just realized we had
> another issue on LKFT (our functional tests tool) for
> proc-self-map-files-001.c. Test 001 does pretty much the same as 002, but
> without the MAP_FIXED mmap flag.
> 
> Is it okay to consolidate both tests into just 1, and focus in checking
> procfs numbers conversion only, rather than if mapping 0 is allowed or not ?
> Can I send a v2 with that in mind ?

As to me -- yes, I would move zero page testing to a separate memory testcase.
But since Alexey is the former author of the tests better wait for his opinion.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gorcunov@gmail.com (Cyrill Gorcunov)
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 20:21:40 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
In-Reply-To: <52504bd5-b4ed-518b-f748-c634172c6c68@linaro.org>
References: <20181011184359.15627-1-rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
 <20181011205601.GA32757@avx2> <20181011210256.GE2401@uranus.lan>
 <20181011213006.GA13485@avx2> <20181011220009.GF2401@uranus.lan>
 <52504bd5-b4ed-518b-f748-c634172c6c68@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20181015172140.GJ2401@uranus.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID: <20181015172140.Yk7V1040ohm0MlSBgeBK6T2HVKKJkfnfPtxK7eFifeM@z>

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018@01:55:14PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> That is what I also had in mind, thus the patch. I just realized we had
> another issue on LKFT (our functional tests tool) for
> proc-self-map-files-001.c. Test 001 does pretty much the same as 002, but
> without the MAP_FIXED mmap flag.
> 
> Is it okay to consolidate both tests into just 1, and focus in checking
> procfs numbers conversion only, rather than if mapping 0 is allowed or not ?
> Can I send a v2 with that in mind ?

As to me -- yes, I would move zero page testing to a separate memory testcase.
But since Alexey is the former author of the tests better wait for his opinion.