From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8159C4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CEE207FF for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730443AbfJNIyR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:54:17 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50540 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729928AbfJNIyR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:54:17 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B654BAF21; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:54:14 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: shuah Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , automated-testing@yoctoproject.org, kernelci@groups.io, George Kennedy , Dhaval Giani , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Boris Ostrovsky , Jan Setje-Eilers , syzkaller Subject: Re: [Automated-testing] syzkaller reproducers Message-ID: <20191014085414.GB31760@rei.lan> References: <876a2abe-41ab-5819-4ae8-ad26186d0d1c@kernel.org> <226099bc-9763-3a73-e26a-b292f601494c@kernel.org> <20191011180248.GA24089@rei.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > You are suposed to run the run.sh script in the bin directory. > > Yeah that does work. > > Would be helpful to have usage instructions instead of failing. :) I do not think that these scripts are ever supposed to be the used in production testing, you need much more than this to produce results reliably. I would expect that they are supposed to be a form of very minimal documentation. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz