From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B090CA9EAD for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04351222BD for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:44:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571510694; bh=9CFLuiWFdO6+3m+Z/pq11pQ0H+caUdr6nuEDwdvj3HM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=DE124Rmb+5sKkaTLcaWXAbQKzQ+SyXchp+LMu468UMn1kDZUOH+QuCWXD/ETTHfZ4 d+eTr6VGEF8XFhD6Sams3d+VzpYrkyV1aDSY/J4Dfesxg//M+dg52qb6JNjBet7FXH 9VmC+ANuY75NyvMZ7yBKpx0TYN+ixFPxnQP59aWc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726112AbfJSSox (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:44:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:36030 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726092AbfJSSox (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:44:53 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id j11so4482868plk.3 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:44:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=r/P/9gjKXByrgJIBzuB+JRS7LPY4d6mkIypKNMQXW+I=; b=VLw5AbU9Xn9QzsKrFHjbQvRNU/aaJhuwP431NVd4Bf73bh5H4KNo0WS2gFoPTuz6k0 6X6fCyT7PSdyBZc2EUTLU2k1gybGb0lHQ3DiM6fa68V/Ak1AayMzRb4uACLYlkxcl3RW /BmKRnDXGjyQM8A/O5VB2dpl6HE8wVj6wWM694ybmCrOh8+snK8E3VLIdNGfArGrmIXh erzhfOig7w1SNRNAcFkz/ciPK8kzLo300f486iOmF/iZwlgDNorPnLHKr1A7r/+uJnwm CLAkYKCaSEk6PwyPO4V8pvI2yQgWw8ALdBCwXLdqMH6nMOixg3M8gzYEgPmh/QacUZUs vS8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqqZ0My16lofjLbmrZD6yI/hYzvtLQC8nsY/oczPxCeWFiNyet jJx9RRFWFQiCy2+eZGiEJ5U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlaj6Cst28rVIVJBlR3dgB+Pn3YrsRH5vCgRMS2JoR/4eoQSEUYcPaU68LIbNfkNdmlUfLoA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b94b:: with SMTP id h11mr16288539pls.21.1571510692749; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 42.do-not-panic.com (42.do-not-panic.com. [157.230.128.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r18sm12225876pfc.3.2019.10.19.11.44.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 11:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 42.do-not-panic.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E216340256; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:44:50 +0000 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Brendan Higgins Cc: Knut Omang , shuah , KUnit Development , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Alan Maguire Subject: Re: Plan for hybrid testing Message-ID: <20191019184450.GH11244@42.do-not-panic.com> References: <20191014104243.GD16384@42.do-not-panic.com> <9212e0fb58683df4781c52e6ad0abd8eb496a452.camel@oracle.com> <869165ea-f7d6-10cf-c74a-14a33b584938@kernel.org> <40941b19855134b5032379ab4b8023a3299bd06a.camel@oracle.com> <20191016130857.GJ16384@42.do-not-panic.com> <345333a20601355202749b1e7de23360dc93126c.camel@oracle.com> <20191018094738.GA11244@42.do-not-panic.com> <20191018192257.GF11244@42.do-not-panic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:58:01PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:23 PM Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > > > Do we really want to focus on this point now? I think it's better to > > > start off with something simple and evolve it. > > > > Addressing it can help simplfiy things long term, as perhaps we really > > don't need something like generic netlink to orchestrate. > > Sure, I just think it sounds like we don't need it for a lot of > things, so if something significantly simpler exists, maybe we should > just start there. But yeah, starting that discussion here and now > doesn't hurt as long as we don't lose sight of something concrete in > the short term. > > Cool, sounds like we are on the same page then. Indeed. Luis