Re: [PATCH v7 06/24] goldish_pipe: rename local pin_user_pages() routine

Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21T08:10:38Z

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> +static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page,
> + unsigned long last_page,
> + unsigned int last_page_size,
> + int is_write,
> + struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND],
> + unsigned int *iter_last_page_size)

Why not goldfish_pin_pages? Normally we put the module / subsystem
in front.

Also can we get this queued up for 5.5 to get some trivial changes
out of the way?