Re: [PATCH v4 11/19] x86/cpu: Print VMX flags in /proc/cpuinfo using VMX_FEATURES_*

Sean Christopherson
2019-12-21T03:48:22Z

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 07:23:46PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/12/19 19:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Using v<feature> across the board makes sense to keep things consistent,
> > i.e. vnmi, vtpr, vapic, etc...
> >
> > Anyone have thoughts on how to shorten "APIC-register virtualization"
> > without colliding with vapic or apicv? I currently have apic_reg_virt,
> > which is a bit wordy. apic_regv isn't awful, but I don't love it.
>
> Perhaps vapic_access and vapic_register?

I ended up going with vapic and vapic_reg, figured everyone looking at
this knows what "reg" is short for, and I like the progression shown by
vapic -> vapic_reg.