From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix the race between registering 'snapshot' event trigger and triggering 'snapshot' operation
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:02:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200413110207.01a48591@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200413071252.13720-1-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:12:52 +0800
Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Traced event can trigger 'snapshot' operation(i.e. calls snapshot_trigger()
> or snapshot_count_trigger()) when register_snapshot_trigger() has completed
> registration but doesn't allocate spare buffer for 'snapshot' event trigger.
> 'snapshot' operation always detects the lack of allocated buffer in the rare
> case so make register_snapshot_trigger() allocate spare buffer first.
>
> trigger-snapshot.tc in kselftest reproduces the issue on slow vm:
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> cat trace
> ...
> ftracetest-3028 [002] .... 236.784290: sched_process_fork: comm=ftracetest pid=3028 child_comm=ftracetest child_pid=3036
> <...>-2875 [003] .... 240.460335: tracing_snapshot_instance_cond: *** SNAPSHOT NOT ALLOCATED ***
> <...>-2875 [003] .... 240.460338: tracing_snapshot_instance_cond: *** stopping trace here! ***
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> index dd34a1b46a86..00e54cdcef3e 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -1088,9 +1088,13 @@ register_snapshot_trigger(char *glob, struct event_trigger_ops *ops,
> struct event_trigger_data *data,
> struct trace_event_file *file)
> {
> - int ret = register_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
> + int alloc_ret, ret;
>
> - if (ret > 0 && tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(file->tr) != 0) {
> + alloc_ret = tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(file->tr);
> +
> + ret = register_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
> +
> + if (ret > 0 && alloc_ret != 0) {
> unregister_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
> ret = 0;
> }
Why register if the allocation failed? Just switch the logic:
int ret = tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(file->tr);
if (ret != 0)
return 0;
return register_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-13 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-13 7:12 [PATCH] tracing: Fix the race between registering 'snapshot' event trigger and triggering 'snapshot' operation Xiao Yang
2020-04-13 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-04-14 1:59 ` Xiao Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200413110207.01a48591@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox